Last UP-Date 1st Mar 2002

       

 

Da:L.J. Timpert (l.j.timpert@student.tn.tudelft.nl)
         Soggetto:What is this???
         Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

 
Data:2000-11-13 11:41:39 PST
 
Hi everyone

A little while ago someone called Perugini advertised with the words

"super triode" in this NG. He put the link

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/ in his post. There are other, quite

incredible things at this page. Take a look, for example, at "working

with the VT25920". It may be my Netscape messing up things here, but

sometimes I see some circuits with some quite astounding properties (for

tubes) and sometimes I see other things not related to tubes. See for

yourself if you see any anomalities. What is going on?

    Besides, if there really is such a thing as the "super triode" he's

on to something big, but the info tells very little. I also question the

authenticity of this "vtw" or "vt-omega" tube. But OTOH, he has the

native (very hard to find) data on the 6H30/6N30 on his site! And they

are accurate. Perhaps someone could give a little more info? Mr Perugini

himself? Just, as the heading says, what does this all mean? Just take a

look at it and be amazed.
Jurgen Timpert
 

Da:Phil (tube@jump.net)
         Soggetto:Re: What is this???
         Newsgroups:rec.audio.tubes

 
 
Data:2000-11-13 16:55:12 PST 
Wow! Thanks for mentioning this. Like you, I look forward to hearing
more about the super triode. Do you suppose it couldbe based on the "inverted
triode mode" mentioned on SteveBench's web site?
       
Phil
 

Da:Gareth (gphillips@bluelou.freeserve.co.uk)
Soggetto:valve choice
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-11-26 12:52:18 PST

Hi to all

firstly many thanks to all who contributed to my rain question im now well

on my way in its design BUT now comes an important choice, what valve to

use. im trying to only use batteries as a power source in my preamp design

so valve choice comes down to

1 availability

2 suitability to a lower HT design ( around 120 v max)

3 cost.

Any suggestions?

Cheers

Gareth

Da:Choky (choky*remove*@eunet.yu)
Soggetto:Re: valve choice
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-11-26 15:42:21 PST

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/battery_powered_mm_phono_stage.htm
 

--

Choky

Prodanovic Aleksandar

choky*remove*@eunet.yu

         YU

remove *remove* to reply!!

"Gareth" <gphillips@bluelou.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message

news:9tua21$r2j$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...

> Hi to all

> firstly many thanks to all who contributed to my rain question im now well

> on my way in its design BUT now comes an important choice, what valve to

> use. im trying to only use batteries as a power source in my preamp design

> so valve choice comes down to

> 1 availability

> 2 suitability to a lower HT design ( around 120 v max)

> 3 cost.

> Any suggestions?

> Cheers

> Gareth

>

>

Da:Choky (choky*remove*@eunet.yu)
Soggetto:Re: valve choice
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-11-26 17:35:48 PST

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/battery_powered_mm_phono_stage.htm
 

--

Choky

Prodanovic Aleksandar

choky*remove*@eunet.yu

         YU

remove *remove* to reply!!

"Gareth" <gphillips@bluelou.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message

news:9tua21$r2j$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...

> Hi to all

> firstly many thanks to all who contributed to my rain question im now well

> on my way in its design BUT now comes an important choice, what valve to

> use. im trying to only use batteries as a power source in my preamp design

> so valve choice comes down to

> 1 availability

> 2 suitability to a lower HT design ( around 120 v max)

> 3 cost.

> Any suggestions?

> Cheers

> Gareth

>

Da:Keith Garratt (mail@ksgarratt.co.uk)
Soggetto:Re: OneTube
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-04-22 04:15:43 PST

What a lovely site.

 

"steperu" <steperu@tin.it> wrote in message

news:BNwE6.72932$s93.7453735@news.infostrada.it...

> http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/onetube_design_page.htm

>

>

Da:mike.hastings (micheal.nospam.hastings@btinternet.com)
Soggetto:Re: OneTube
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-04-22 07:34:12 PST

I'll second that - good informative stuff and well presented

 

Mike

"Keith Garratt" <mail@ksgarratt.co.uk> wrote in message

news:te5fausu0c0mda@xo.supernews.co.uk...

> What a lovely site.

>

> "steperu" <steperu@tin.it> wrote in message

> news:BNwE6.72932$s93.7453735@news.infostrada.it...

> > http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/onetube_design_page.htm

> >

> >

>

Da:per_hoegberg@my-deja.com (per_hoegberg@my-deja.com)
Soggetto:Re: SUPER TRIODE
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2000-11-10 00:50:11 PST

In article <8ug5bb$8s$1@nslave3.tin.it>,

  "steperu" <steperu@tin.it> wrote:

> http://digilander.iol.it/paeng

>

Hi, What is this? (A page is not hard to do) but what is this??? mvh/Pär

 

 

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

Before you buy.

Da:giuseppegualandi@my-deja.com (giuseppegualandi@my-deja.com)
Soggetto:Re: SUPER TRIODE
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2000-11-11 02:20:07 PST

In article <8ugcbk$gqa$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  per_hoegberg@my-deja.com wrote:

> In article <8ug5bb$8s$1@nslave3.tin.it>,

>   "steperu" <steperu@tin.it> wrote:

> > http://digilander.iol.it/paeng

> >

> Hi, What is this? (A page is not hard to do) but what is this??? mvh/Pär

>

> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

> Before you buy.

>

This is really a SUPER site, and we all should be grateful for

always new rabbits he gets from his magician's silk-hat.

Even if  one (like me) may disagree on the advisability of distortion

cancelling tecnique in audio. About this argument i am ,when i will

found the time, trying to understand what happen to low signals that

accompaign large ones, using a spice simulation.

saluti, giuseppe.
 

 

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

Da:Giuseppe (g_gualandi@yahoo.it)
Soggetto:Re: the bench
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-05-18 10:14:13 PST

"steperu" <steperu@tin.it> wrote in message news:<pFWM6.11278$jp1.702342@news.infostrada.it>...

> http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/vt25920_test_bench.htm

 

grande!
        saluti,giuseppe.


Da:Oskari Heinonen (Oskari.Heinonen@cs.Helsinki.FI)
Soggetto:Re: To Russia with love ;))
Newsgroups:
rec.audio.tubes

Data:2001-11-14 16:09:08 PST

Francois Yves Le Gal wrote:

> 

> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 15:01:28 +0100, "Choky" <choky*remove*@eunet.yu>

> wrote:

> 

> >     I need data and L. lines or anything......

> 

> Tubes.ru has some quite extensive data for most of Russian tubes.

> http://www.tubes.ru/

 

Some additional links.

 

  http://oldradio.qrz.ru/

  http://www.klausmobile.narod.ru/

  http://www.paeng-design.com/

 

-- 

Oskari Heinonen  * University of Helsinki *  Department of Computer Science

Oskari.Heinonen@cs.Helsinki.FI * http://www.cs.Helsinki.FI/Oskari.Heinonen/


 

Da:Heikki Kaskelma (kashei@mas-oy.com)
Soggetto:Re: Putkivahvistin
Newsgroups:
sfnet.harrastus.elektroniikka

Data:2001-07-01 05:32:25 PST

Ari Laitinen wrote

> Mahtaakohan nuo elektroniikka simulaattoriohjelmat käsitellä putkia.

> Sellaisen kanssa voisi olla turvallista ja nopeaa kokeilla ja testata

> kytkentää erilaisilla arvoilla ennen alkaa kasaamaan oikeaa laitetta.



Netistä näyttäisi löytyvän aiheesta paljonkin, varsinkin triodin

simuloinnista.



http://www.duncanamps.com/

http://www.birotechnology.com/articles/VTspice.html

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/readers_respond.htm

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/4422/index.html

http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~mmccorq/tubes/simulation/simulation.html

http://www.lynx.bc.ca/~jc/model.html



Heikki Kaskelma

Da:Pim Schaeffer (uce@ftc.gov)
Soggetto:Re: Een gestabbiliseerde voeding ZONDER geïntegreerde componenten.
Newsgroups:
nl.hobby.elektronica, alt.nl.electronica.zelfbouw, be.science.electronics

Data:2002-02-20 14:25:57 PST

Ben wrote:

> 

> "Michiel Roos" <roosmcd@dds.nl> schreef in bericht

> news:3C73E84C.D1D85406@dds.nl...

> > >

> > > En de zenerdiode met extra transistor er achter dan ?? Of is dat te simpel ?

> > >

> >

> >  Je moet wel aan je cijfer denken :). Staat er ergens dat het verboden is om

> > buizen te gebruiken?

> >

> >   Michiel

> >

> 

>  Buizen..... Da's wel lekker comfortabel bijverwarmen.....

> 

> Is er nog iemand die een 5 V voeding kan maken die 1 ampere levert, met

> buizen ? Lijkt met inderdaad een uitdaging.

> 

> Tenzij een buis natuurlijk ook weer een geintegreerd component is....



Wel eens een nuvistor gezien? <http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/nuv.gif>

-- 

pim

Het is de vrijheid van iemand zo verward te zijn als hij zelf wil.


            
            best music possible on a budget

Posted by yamski on August 14, 2001 at 10:26:00

I love music., but i just dont have the money for it "high end" gear. I am by far not an audiophile, and i do not aspire to be. How can i assemble a system on DIY seperates, what references should i refer to for the plans of each of these components and cables, and what would the total cost be. Tubes, foreplay pre amp, full range drivers, tqwp & voigt pipes interests me. Altough, i do not wnat to throw out the possiblities on solid state. I would like to note that i do like bass and simplicity & purist designs. I am looking for CHEAPEST solution to high end. Its a hobby for me to find these hidden secrets. My gear now includes audiosource amp two, nht super two, an old yamaha cd player.

In Reply to: best music possible on a budget posted by yamski on August 14, 2001 at 10:26:00:

Good question.

Here are some sub-$1000 ideas for a whole system, end to end.

1) CD Transport: Philips CDM12, available at steinmusic.de
Cost: $200 or less.
2) Kusunoki/Convertus 4x TDA1543 DAC, wired directly to the I2S outputs of the transport/CD player: $50.
3) Some amplifier ideas:
Bottlehead 2A3 monoblocks: $500 with tubes
PAEng-Design 6c45 "spud" amp: $400-ish
PAEng-Design 6c45 push-pull: $600-ish
How cheap can you go? You can get SET output transformers for $30 or less (Hammond makes one), maybe pair it with a 6EM8 tube. I bet you could do a stereo amp for less than $200. Less bass with cheap OPTs, though.

LM1875 "gainclone" op-amp: $100. Good bass.

4) Wire: pure silver with teflon tube as insulation, or make your own paper/cloth insulation: $30

5) Speakers: The very basic could be a simple TQWT design using Radio Shack or Fostex drivers. Cost: less than $200.
Or: something based on the Eminence Beta12LTA. Good bass.
Or: Some Diatone P610s. ($300-ish)

6) Go mono: I've been listening to mono. For a DIYer on a budget, it makes a lot of sense. Your speaker and amp costs are cut nearly in half, and there's a lot less building involved. Plus you can use ridiculously BIG speakers in mono, and it doesn't take up too much room. How about an Altec 605? ($400-ish)

7) It's easier if you have a small room and listen at relatively low levels. Less speaker/amp demands.

Posted by nl on December 01, 2001 at 09:10:45

In Reply to: with transducers at a high level in the 1930's - when will consumer digital 'catch up'? posted by freddyi on November 25, 2001 at 14:56:02:

It's amazingly easy to build your own DAC. I did it. It was my first major electronics project, and it worked on the first try (once I resoldered an intermittent ground connection). You can go nuts on battery power because everything runs on 5V supplies. The whole thing shouldn't cost you more than $200--maybe less than $50 if you build it into your existing CD player (i.e. no S/PDIF receiver), more if you go with transformer outputs. I point-to-point soldered the whole thing, no circuit boards.

Right now, lots of people seem to favor zero-feedback designs (see TNT-audio's Convertus) and transformer outputs (see Andrea Ciuffoli's webpage, and PAEng Design).

             Posted by Antonio Tucci on August 23, 2001 at 21:45:26

People, let have a look at this Super Power Triode (http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/tst_omega11.htm) proposed by Perugini in its interesting web-site (http://www.paeng-design.com)!

P.S.
For Dennis (ChimeraOne): in that site the author has reported interesting data regarding the 6C45P tube ...!

Posted by mqracing (M) on August 24, 2001 at 08:39:09

In Reply to: Super Power Triode posted by Antonio Tucci on August 23, 2001 at 21:45:26:

Hi Antonio:

Thanks for the leads to several interesting websites which also themselves linked to several more interesting websites with some wonderful articles and schematics.

One such addtional link I thought worth mentioning on it's own. It's at Jeff Rowland's amplfier site. This article is a wonderful introduction to the theory and operation of transformers. And it is written well enough for the less than magnetics engineer to really get something out of it in terms of gaining an appreciation of how these devices work.

About a week ago Dave Slagle was asking about and wondering about "ideal" models of trans and what these ideal models might look like or what features an ideal trans would have... well... this article is at least one good shot at providing an answer to this question as well.

here is the link http://www.jeffrowland.com/tectalk2.htm

and, Antonio, cool pages on all the single tube amps and 6C45 circuit variations and implemenations.

thanks,


MSL

In Reply to: Re: Super Power Triode posted by MQracing on August 24, 2001 at 08:39:09:

I put together a small amp based on Stefano's single tube 6C45 plans a few weeks ago.

Pic's are at:

Front View
Bottom View

The 6C45 is a rather revealing tube - anything poorly recorded can be very harsh and annoying, while well recorded material has a wonderful clarity and detail. It sounds like a large 417A in many ways.

There was also a Prior Discussion of this amp a bit back in the archives. Doc B suggested a few changes to ease the analytical sound - I've tried bypassing the filament, and already have grid stoppers and ferrite's in place. I may try a few other changes including changing the input 100K to 10K in the future. The latest valve issue also has more info on the 6C45.


Gary's Tube Page

Posted by nl on September 26, 2001 at 05:14:53

In Reply to: I'm a first timer with valve amps,but plan to get a SET amp straight away,need advice! posted by ChadTaylor on September 20, 2001 at 02:31:46:

With $2500 you'd be best off to buy a WHOLE NEW SYSTEM. Keep your CD player (for now), and get all new amps and speakers.

The simple and obvious thing to do would be to go to Bottlehead and get the straight Bottlehead setup. Build a Foreplay first, to learn how to solder. Then their Paramour 2A3. Then put together some Straight 8, Super 12 or similar speakers. Aim for efficiency of over 95db. You could do all of that for about $1200, which leaves you $1200 to build the tube amp of your dreams, now that you know what you're doing.

If you really want an off-the-shelf amp to plug into your system, and keep your speakers, I'd recommend a Williamson-type pentode amp. Maybe a Jolida. But don't expect triode glory.

If you want something simpler/cheaper/cooler, try this:

6c45 amp from Stephan Perugini: about $500
Afterburner speaker from Thorsten Loesch: about $350


Posted by nl on July 21, 2001 at 21:39:33

In Reply to: need help on assembling first set/high efficiency speaker combo posted by Krisgel on July 20, 2001 at 23:43:15:

$5000 might be TOO MUCH to begin with. It may be better to budget $3000 or so, or even $1500...

There are plenty of great kits out there. The diyhifisupply.com 300B kit has been gettin grave reviews. Otherwise, consider the kits from Bottlehead and Welborne Labs, both sponsors of this site. I owned the Welborne Moondog and have heard the Bottlehead parafeed 2A3 amps. Great stuff....and around $1400.

For speakers, I would consider the Oris 150 or 200 sets, or some homebrew stuff using vintage gear. Altec stuff is relatively cheap and plentiful in the United States. Go to eBay. An Altec compression driver+wood horn+15" woofer in homemade bass reflex cabs is a classic setup. The Altec 604 is also a super-classic. The Hammer Dynamics Super 12 and Bottlehead (I think they dropped the Electronic Tonalities name??) Straight 8 are good designs.

After looking into those closely, you will either find something to buy or be inspired with some kooky ideas of your own.

If you want to go even cheaper, consider a 6c45 amp from the schematics by Stephan Perugini. $500 should do it for a stereo SET. He'll even sell you the trannies, which are cheap because they don't have to deal with a lot of current. That's about 1500 mW, so you will need very high ef speakers to pair with it. (Or try his 2-tube one stage push pull, with 10 watts.) You could do a pair of eminence Beta12LTs in an open baffle with a tweeter in between...or some 604s....total cost around $400-$500 and efficiency around 101db. That's a $1000 SET solution that could blow your mind. Buy music with the other $4000, or start working on your DIY DAC. You can buy a transport from Steinmusic.de for $200 (including shipping), add on a $50 zero-oversampling DAC stage, and have a source worthy of your SET amps.

Posted by Thorsten on September 13, 1999 at 06:21:27:

In Reply to: Tweaks for Meridian 506.20 CD Player? posted by Steven Towne on September 09, 1999 at 07:38:48:

Hi there,

Okay, as no-one is really radical here, one or two from the fringe.

The 506.20 uses (if memeory serves) the CS4329 DAC Chip. The newer CS4390 sounds somewhat better and is plug in compatible. So simply swap these chip's for starters.

Another interesting mod is to the Output Stage that reoplaces all the Op-Amp's and other nasties by a simple Transformer SPECIFICALLY designed for that job.

They are available here:

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/8231/perugini.html

All of these should doable with a minimum of physical changes to the unit and are reversable.

That said, even under such conditions I still feel that the Crystal Chip's sound rather dire, so best tweak is to buy a decent CD-Player.... Only they are really thin on the ground....

Ciao Thorsten

Posted by THOR (A) on October 15, 2001 at 00:04:04

I have become convinced of the excellence of the 6C45PI
and would like to use it in this circuit, but im over my
head :) The 6C45 apparently runs happily at 220 Volts and
up to 250 max according to this http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/onetube_design_page.htm
so I believe that it can drive a steroid 300B, but I dont
know how to change it over. It would live with the
conditions in the amp but can it be substituted with
minimal changes and provide enough voltage swing and
drive for 10 to 12 watts ? Further can the 6C45Pi be used
with battery bias in this circuit ? If so does anyone know what
changes that would entail ?) Thanks for all the help
everyone , im slowly learning a little .
This has ben quite the expierience so far :)

Posted by Michael Amster (A) on December 07, 2001 at 16:19:52

Hi:

I am a DIY beginner, though I have an EE background. I have looked at a couple of the battery powered Phono stages out there like Thorsten Loesch's Analog Addict stage and Klaus Boening's Dr. Groove II stage. Both look like they can be done by beginners and have good results. If anyone has built these, I would love to correspond.

Anyway, here are some questions:

1. For the Analog Addict 'El Cheapo' phono stage, where does one find a 10H 30ohm DCR inductor? If I could source this, I think I would start with this one first.

2. Which battery chargers are people using - I found a source for Yuasa NP 2-12 batteries, but would like reqs on chargers for parallel charging.

3. What's the difference between the OPA637AP and OPA637BP? I looked at the TI/BB site and there is little mentioned. Are these different grades of the same chip?

4. For the Dr. Groove, what 9V batteries/charger do people recommend?

5. What are the maximum MM input voltages for clipping? My Goldring 1042 is rated for a high 6.5mv. The El Cheapo was tested with this, but I am not sure about the Dr. Groove (looks like I could always lower the gain to make it work).

Thanks a ton. Reading the archives has made me eager to start a DIY project.

-MA

Posted by MG16 (A) on December 07, 2001 at 17:34:02

In Reply to: Building a DIY battery phono stage posted by Michael Amster on December 07, 2001 at 16:19:52:


Heres one I am currently building. From Glass Audio.
http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/a_pspiced_low.htm

Posted by JanB on October 07, 2001 at 12:46:36

In Reply to: stripped down tube kit - other than Foreplay? posted by hollywood_steve on October 06, 2001 at 18:23:33:

Hey
I can't think of any better than this!!
http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/onetube_design_page.htm
Simple and true high-end.
Best Regards
JanB

Posted by mlloyd1 (i) on July 23, 2001 at 17:21:50

In Reply to: Digital Volume Control Kitset, specifically for Angelus posted by Tazo on July 20, 2001 at 11:03:52:

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/CS3310_a_stereo_digital_volume_control_.htm

Just found this link that might (or might not) be useful to the person that was looking for info on CS3310 kits.

Michael

Posted by mg16 (A) on January 13, 2002 at 10:19:20

Hi,
I built a very nice tube phono preamp circuit that uses 2 sealed lead acid batterys. http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/a_pspiced_low.htm
The project included a charger circuit based on the L200 integrated circuit. I can find no parts suppliers on the web that carry the L200, in the USA.
I think it may be a European part. I currently use a Radio Shack charger that takes 4-5 hours to charge each battery. It will only charge 1 battery at a time. The filiments draw a constant 600 ma., and I am not getting enough listening time between charges. I actually would like to go to double the batterys ,(parallel), for the filiment supply,(It uses 2 for a 24 volt B+), which would be a total of 4 sla batteries.
I would like to buy 4 L200's, and build a charger that has 4 seperate L200 circuits, to charge all 4 batterys at the same time.
Does anyone have some they would sell me? Or know where I can buy them?
Thanks
mg16

 

Posted by Thorsten (A) on February 04, 2002 at 10:45:18

In Reply to: Call for Adagio DAC Builders posted by Matthias M. on February 04, 2002 at 08:34:35:

Hi,

Just a hint. As explained in our private mails - the Adagio will remain a esotheric animal. Before it got pushed into this direction I had for possible commercial release made studies of a much simplified version that should however deliver most of what the big brother does. This was discussed on an arcane HK based Board, so I here repeate the entire conversion as Q&A....

Some random conversations about the Adagio'lito
(little/lite Adagio) DAC

Q:

CS8414/PCM1716 DAC Kit, does anyone know who sells this DAC kit now? Anyone try? Any good?

A (by T):

Try: www.diyzone.net.

I did try and I was not impressed by the sound. It is however still worth getting, because you can cut the PCM1716 of and with a little skill fit a TDA1545 to the PCB (Op-Amp Position) and re-use/rebuild the powersupplies to give you +5V for the TDA1545.

Then you have a simple, cheap but great 16-bit non oversampling DAC. I have designed a tube output for the TDA1545 which with minor changes would work great with such a non oversampling concept.

Q:

Is your PCB for the DAC available for sale yet

A (by T):

No and it is unlikely to become available soon. most People want a full Kit and not just a PCB and require more support than I can afford to give, so I suspect the PCB's for DIY'ers are now permanantly shelved.

Q:

I am really ignorant in digital audio. Can you show me how to change to the use of TDA 1545. Was that a dropin replacement? Can I avoid the uses of IT/chokes as described on your site that for TDA1541?

A (by T):

It is not a drop in replacement, in effect you cut away all the tracks around the 8-Pin Op-Amp and the original DAC Chip. Then you wire the whole thing up in the classic "hard wired" fashion, it's only a few wires (3pcs for the Data & Clock, one ground, one Powersupply) and a few resistors and capacitors.

But basically you MUST be comfortable with DIY electronics, otherwise don't bother.

Yes, for the 1545 I have a schematic on DJ's Cheap Tube Audio in the files section which is meant for the cheap Marantz/Philips CD Players which also use the TDA1545. However, it will require "re-tuning" of the Analogue Filter to work well with non oversampling, at the moment the values shown are for the oversampling filter used in the CD-Players....

I checked the design through, here is what it should look like for Non Oversampling (only changed values shown)....

R2 = 100
R3 = 18k
R4 = 11k
R5 = 15k
R9 = 24K

C1 = 1n5 Silver Mica
C2 = 100p Silver Mica
C3 = 4n7 Silver Mica

The load on the Output Should ideally be 100K or higher.

Also note that the circuit discussed is suitable ONLY for the TDA1545, NOT for the TDA1541 or ANY other Chip. The changed Values for the Filter noted above are ONLY for non oversampling at 44.1KHz and are not valid at any other sample frequency.

In the same place (DJ CTA) there is also a Schematic for a "super regulator" aimed at supplying the TDA1545.

The whole resulting DAC (the Cheap DAC Kit, TDA1545 and above Valve Analogue stage can probably deliver around 70 - 80% of the sound the Adagio offers.

Q:

I will have to build the same from scratch - etching and drilling a pcb would not be a problem. Do you think the schematics per following would be the same:

http://diglander.iol.it/paeng/a simple 96 khz dac.htm

A (by T):

It is exactly the Kit. All you need to do is to connect the TDA1545 Data Inputs to the relevant outputs from the CS8414 and to add the two 11k Resistors and the Decoupling Cap on the TDA1545 Reference pin (look at the Datasheet on the Philips Web-Site).

Q:

hard to believe by changing a few caps and resistors this would become a non-os. truly amazing.

A (by T):

NO, NO, NO. The changes in capacitors Values are to accomodate a DAC that operates without Oversampling, they do not make (for example) a Philipc CD723 Player into a non-oversampling one.

The changes in capacitor values are needed as the Non Oversampling DAC has a staircase type current output with the "steps" being spaced with a 44.1KHz Frequency. This leads realistically to several decibel HF rolloff.

By making the a Lowpass Filter with a certain degree of "peaking" in the response we can offset this rolloff. However this only required if the DAC operates non oversampling. If the DAC is fed an oversampled signal, like in the Philips CD-723 CD-Player this additional > 3db lift at 20KHz would be very undesirable. So hence the change of values for this pecific application.

Q:

Do you think it is beneficiary if I change the bridge rectifiers to tube? - I just have a tungsol 5u4gb to spare. Whats the value of C6? Do I need to change the caps and add a choke?

A (by T):

Yes. I would in fact recommend the full Supply from the design referneced below:

http://www.diyaudio.de/archive/dac2.pdf

Q:

Referring to the schematics from the digilander.iol.it site, do I just "float" Cc of the CS8414? Fsync connect to WS, Sck to BCK, Sdata to DATA? Mck will again be "floated"?

A (by T):

Yes, this should work.

Q:

On the TDA1545, I obtained the block diagram from the Philips website. There is a Vref outlet from the Iref thro' a 33K resistor.
A (by T):

The whole Vref shooting match is needed, also, make both resistors in the Vref circuit 11k, this improved the dynamic range and is needed for my design. You will also need the decoupling Cap, the better quality the better, Sanyo Os-Con SH Series or Black Gate PK are minimum, Black Gate NX-HiQ are better.

Q:

Do I need to connect this Vref somewhere? Also the Vref feeds a couple of Opamps. Do I just ignore the Vref when I use tube analog stage?

A (by T):

Other than feeding it to the chip - yes. It has no further external application.

This is the state of affairs so far, I doubt that there will be much more on exchanges, as short of giving a full hands on tutorial this should cover it anyway.

Other items for reference in this context:

TNT-Audio Convertus DAC design Documents (loads of background and so on, please read this rather than bugging me):

http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/convertus1_e.html

The Convertus uses 4 X TDA1543 instead of 1 X TDA1545, Input formats, most connections etc are similar for both chips, main differences are the Reference Pins.

TDA1545 Datasheet:

http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/datasheets/TDA1545A_T_3.pdf

The TDA1545 suffers from variations in series production and AFAIK they are still being "graded", it is worth getting the better grades.

Functionally this chip mimics the Operation of the TDA1541, but it operates using CMOS (as oppsoed to bipolar) circuitry and it has the dynamic matching reference capacitors on board, plus it requires just one low current positive 5V supply.

Later T

PS, If there are specific questions the above references and converstions do NOT cover, feel free to ask here, I'll endeavour to answer, but please note that this whole thing is considered by me as "NOT SUPPORTED". So I'll answer ONLY if I feel the question has general merit and if I have sufficient time to answer.

 

Posted by mg16 (A) on January 25, 2002 at 13:27:08

In Reply to: Temporary Phono Stage? posted by AlanS on January 25, 2002 at 11:29:35:

Hi,
I don't claim to be an expert, but I am using a diy tube phono stage that runs on (2) 12 volt, lead acid batterys published in Glass Audio a few years ago. It uses 2 7308 tubes per channel, with riaa network between the stages. Was fairly simple to build, and it sounds very good to me. Nice big airy soundstage, good depth, plenty of detail, and quiet.
The article gives a schematic, and I designed a pcb board for it using Ron Welbornes Assist program. If you want a copy, email me. I have no way of sending it via computer, but could snail mail you a copy. Check it out here:
http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/a_pspiced_low.htm
mg16

Posted by jenya on May 17, 2001 at 14:08:32

In Reply to: Maybe a Parafeed 5842/417a headphone amp isn't such a good idea (Paul Joppa) (Jeremy Epstein) posted by G on May 15, 2001 at 17:53:18:

Hi,
I thought I'll share my Headphone Amp Building story with you. Actually, J.Epstein suggested to me to do that.

Anyway, I have been in the process of building a headphone amplifier for 8 months or so. The very first version was a 6SN7 SRPP OTL as seen at http://headwize.com/projects/strain1_prj.htm

That amplifier was probably the best version of all the ones that followed it until my very last one. It sounded very bright, accurate, fast. Nice tight bass and lots of treble. However, comparing to my 300B SE, it didn't have same feel of depth, presence. Treble were quite harsh, which could be attributed for using Solens. Sorry for using vague subjective terms.

I decided to pursue SE transformer coupled design and put together an amp as seen in the previous issue of Valve (I think it was #7). In that article author described a very similar symptoms of his SRPP OTL experience and suggested a 6BX7 SE with Hammond 125A universal OPT as a solution. I found the sound of this version to be a step in the right direction but inadequate for my listening demand. In particular, I thought that 125A was incapable of producing the sound that falls into hifi category. The bass was practically absent.

That made me to look for better OPTs and I have had Jack Elliano(Electra-Print) to wind a pair of OPTs with 5K primary, 32Ohm secondary (I have Grados), rated for 40mA of current. I also asked him to wind a set of plate load chokes just in case if I decide to go with parafeed. Jack did a great job and his transformers greatly greatly improved sound of that 6BX7 SE amp. I have tried parafeed ( I hade to interleave OPT laminations for that) and didn't like it. If you do a search on this site, you may be able to find a thread with my report on it.

Even though 6BX7 SE sounded quite good, there was something lacking in it. It didn't have good microdynamics. Sound was lacking in resolution. I tried to drive 6BX7 with 6SN7, later I replaced 6BX7 with 300B. Still no improvement in resolution. I applied 11dB of Negative Feedback. It helped alot. However it took something from the sound as well. As I understand it, negative feedback should not be a measure to make a bad amp sound right. An amp should sound pretty much right without NFB. So I wasn't satisfied with that version either.

Finally (sorry for being too wordy), I followed Jack Elliano's suggestion to try a hi mu triodes. In particular, he recommended 6C45Pi with its 50-60 mu and low Rp. I have to say, that this is the best amp I have made so far. It sounds great. Seems like everything finally fell into one piece: depth, presence, speed, resolution, details.

I don't claim that this my final version, but it seems to be a very good candidate for becoming the one. I still will try to apply very little of NFB and do bunch of measurements. The only problem with it is that I have way too much of amplification for headphone listening level. Basically, I don't get to turn volume pot past 3 o'clock.

You can find few schematics of SE 6C45 amp on the web. Keep in mind that WE437 is a very similar tube and you may use curcuites that use that tube as well. Here is the one that I used: http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/high_sigma_vacuum_tubes_part3.htm
Please note, that that schematic uses 280-0-280 power transformer. using that transformer will put the tube above max rated plate voltage. It may not be a problem, as you may conclude from reading J.Epstein's reply to my post in Tube forum: http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/tubes/messages/53952.html
I am using 190-0-190 transformer.

Good luck,
Jenya

 

Project published in Glass Audio 2/98 by Stephano Perugini. It uses 2 7308 tubes per channel, and 2 12 volt lead acid batterys. Quite simple to build, and sounds excellent. Detailed and transparent on top ,with good dynamics and fairly good bass. Excellent soundstage.
I was getting maybe 6 hours of listening time between charges using 5 AH batterys, and decided to build a regulated power supply to supply the 12 volt filament and 24 volt plate voltages.
I used the schematic from Ron Welbornes website, (PS1 dual voltage, regulated power supply using LT regulators), to build 2 positive sections of the supply. I used an LT1085CT for the 24 volt plate supply regulator, and an LM317T regulator for the 12 volt filiment supply section.
Large filter caps were Cornell Dublier, and film bypass caps were inexpensive Xicon polypropylynes. Resistors were Vishay/Dale 1/2 watt metal films. Rectifiers are Fast/soft Recovery types.
All parts were sourced from Mouser, except for the transformers, which are mounted outside the main cabinet.
I bought a 12 volt / 2 amp and a 25.2 vct /450 ma. transformer from Rat Shack for a few bucks each. I hand drew the pcb trace pattern on a RS blank copper pcb board using automotive,( scratch touch up paint ),that comes with a fine brush built into the cap.
I etched the board using RS Ferric Chloride. Took about 1/2 hour and then I drilled the mounting pads with a 1/16 inch drill bit in a Dremil tool.
Power supply and signal wiring used was some left over Audioquest type 4 solid.
It sounds wonderfull and if its now noiseier than it was with batterys, I can't tell. Its great not to have to recharge batterys though.
One thing about the circuit: It is a little low on the gain side. ,My Ortofon X3-MC fed the phono stage, which fed a DIY Bride of Zen line preamp. The Boz has a gain of only 15 db, and I couldn't get anything above easy listening level.
I switched to the line stage of a Curcio Daniel, and it was much better, but still wouldn't rock the house.
I bought a Grado red which has a 5-6 mv output, and now have all the volume I need with the line amp gain controls at 3 o'clock. Haven't tried the higher output cartridge with the BOZ yet. I am too busy enjoying the music.
Reccomended!
System:
Oracle Delphi MKII/OL modded RB250 arm/Grado red.
Stephano Perugini 7308 tube phono stage
Curcio Daniel tube 6dj8 linestage
DIY Single ended Glory 45 tube amp.
Modded Lascala loudspeakers.
Cardas quadlink biwire speaker cables and quadlink IC's.
MG16

7308 Battery powered tube phono project is excellent.

If any one is looking for a great sounding tube phono preamp that you can build yourself, try Stefano Perigini's "A Pspiced low voltage phono preamplifier with harmonic distortion cancellation". It was originally published in Glass Audio 2/98. The entire project is on the web here.
http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/a_pspiced_low.htm
I built it and am using it with an Oracle MKII/Rega O.L. RB250/Goldring 1022, and it sounds very sweet and musical.
It uses (2) 12 volt lead acid batterys wired in series for a 24 volt B+, and 12 volts tapped off to feed each pair of tube filaments per channel in series.
I used Radio Shack 12 volt lead acid batteries with 5 AH capability. He reccomends 7 AH available at Digikey. Total power supply cost was $50.00 for the 2 batterys. (4) 7308'S on Ebay cost me $40.00.
There was only a schematic, and I did the pcb layout using ASSIST software. Maybe $50.00 in passive components, and $41.00 for an 8" by 14" deep sescom cabinet to house everything.
The soundstage is wide extending well beyond the speakers. Instruments can be heard existing in space behind the speakers. Bass is full. Dynamics are very good also. The top end is just slightly recessed, which is very pleasing to listen to on most of my LP'S. On some records,(Frank Zappa; Overnight Sensation), it is slightly too soft. I used Panasonic coupling caps that I had on hand, where he reccomended Wimas. I think the Wimas may liven the top a little, and plan on changing to them when I can get them.
All in all, it is worth far more than the $150.00 I spent to build it.
It was fairly easy to build, and worked great from turn-on.
There is a battery charger circuit schematic along with the preamp project, but I use my 12volt car battery charger that I bought for auto use.
I used an 8 terminal screw type strip to connect the 2 batterys to the circuit, This uses 3 of the screws. 3 other screws on the terminal strip are connected to bannana jacks at the back of the cabinet to connect both batteries in parrallel for charging. I need to remove the cover each time to recharge, and switch the 3 wires from the circuit feed screws, to the charger connected screws. Takes a few minutes, but some type of switching arrangement would be more convienient.
I reccomend this to anyone desiring a really good sounding tube phono stage on the cheap.
I have the pcb artwork stored, and if anyone is interested, send me a self addressed stamped envelope, and I'll mail you a copy. Its not in the form that I can email. Email me for my address.
MG16

Posted by Phil R (A) on July 12, 2002 at 06:45:29

In Reply to: Re: Maybe a Pro-ject Phono Box posted by unclekyle on July 11, 2002 at 14:59:02:

Here's a link to the plans:

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

Follow the link to "GA Article" for the full description. I used Sovtek 6922's instead of the more costly ECC188-SQ. They work fine. This was my first DIY project and it went off without a hitch. I didn't even know how to solder when I started out.

Good luck,
Phil

    Posted by Phil R (A) on June 20, 2002 at 08:54:00

    In Reply to: I thought so posted by 2channelman on June 19, 2002 at 12:02:04:

     

If you're looking for an interesting phono stage DIY project check out the battery-powered tube stage at this site:

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

Go to the link labeled "GA article" for the full description.

I built this as my first DIY project having pretty minimal knowledge of electronics and tubes. Had to learn how to solder to do it. With the exception of the tubes and sockets you can get all the parts from Digi-Key for well under $100. Given the lower than usual voltages involved it seems a good project for first-timers (safe). Mine runs on 6922's and sounds great!

Have fun,

Phil

P.S.
I don't mean to take anything away from Doc and the gang. This is just an alternative for those that can't wait.



JFB,

If you're interested the link will take you to the Russian decoder.


 

Has anyone done this pre amp before, I am new to this DIY thing, can anyone tell me what actually are the value for the two capacitors shown on the schematic, are they 0.47Uf & 0.1uf or 47u & 1u?
This is the link to the wed site and schematic.

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

i have bought all the parts and the chassis as well now only figuring out the capacitor and solder on that all.

You assistance is much appreciated.


Cloud

They are 47u & 1u.

Look at www.paeng-design.com for a 24V 12V battery powered phono preamp with 7308's
Check it and its companion line stage here:
http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/a_pspiced_low.htm
mg16
I'm in the same boat that you are. I'm a newbie at this though, and I am currently waiting for the stain to finish drying on oak base for my Battery Powered Line Preamp
(http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm).

I was thinking of using this schematic and the power supply from the GA Article Phono Preamp on the site, and expanding it to use 6 7308 tubes (5.1) and a DACT 6 channel stepped attenuator.
I haven't done any power calculations or anything yet (gotta finish the first project before moving the the next!)

It's a very simple circuit, and few inmates have built the Phono Preamp with much success.

Just my newbie thoughts...

E

Hi,
Here is a great tube linestage that is not expensive, very simple to build, and sounds excellent.
It uses a total of 2 7308 tubes, 4 capacitors, and 10 resistors, for a 2 channel line amp. It is designed to run off of a pair of 12volt/5amp/hr. lead acid batterys, but I used a 6.3vac/2a and 25.6vac/.5a Radio Shack power transformers that cost about $6-$8 bucks apiece. A pair of adjustable 3 terminal voltage regulators,($2.00 each, 1 set at 12.6 vdc for series filament connection, the other set at 25.6 vdc for B+), 8 1n4002 rectifier diodes,($3), a couple resistors, and
2 4700/35 volt electrolytic capacitors. The 7308 tubes were Sylvania green lettering, bought on ebay for about $20.00 each. You can get phenolic or plastic tubes sockets for $1.75 each. I did spend a little more on the coupling capacitors,( I used Multicaps that ran about $20.00 for the four of them, but Panasonic polypropylenes from Digikey are excellent sounding at about 1/4 the cost.
Total cost with a little enclosure and line cord and switch is about:
$100.
The tubes are wired with one section of each tube being a constant current source/plate load for the other section. Sometimes called SRPP.
The great thing about it is its sounds vert tube like with a nice wide soundstage, 3d midrange, and slightly soft top end. Very fun to listen to. Also, it is easy to upgrade later with better caps, tubes, volume pot,(I used the Radio Shack 100k alps for $2.00), but upgraded later to a better one. It sounds great even using the less than premium parts.
If you want to look into it go here:
http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm
good luck!
mg16
I foudn this site that says two teo stage 845 is possible ..

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/high_sigma_vacuum_tubes_part2.htm

Too ambitious? .if so I'm a little disapointed...

C.Y :-(

Here's a link to the plans:

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

Follow the link to "GA Article" for the full description. I used Sovtek 6922's instead of the more costly ECC188-SQ. They work fine. This was my first DIY project and it went off without a hitch. I didn't even know how to solder when I started out.

Good luck,
Phil

If you're looking for an interesting phono stage DIY project check out the battery-powered tube stage at this site:

http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

Go to the link labeled "GA article" for the full description.

I built this as my first DIY project having pretty minimal knowledge of electronics and tubes. Had to learn how to solder to do it. With the exception of the tubes and sockets you can get all the parts from Digi-Key for well under $100. Given the lower than usual voltages involved it seems a good project for first-timers (safe). Mine runs on 6922's and sounds great!

Have fun,

Phil

P.S.
I don't mean to take anything away from Doc and the gang. This is just an alternative for those that can't wait.

SE
http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/a_6c45_Single_Tube_Amp.htm
http://www.jogis-roehrenbude.de/Leserbriefe/Carstens-SE/6s45pe-se.htm

PP
http://ekingsbu.users4.50megs.com/pi.html

Hello World!

I'm modeling tube amps and just spent a half hour looking for some Spice models I had for various tubes. I seem to have lost them somewhere, so that's not happening again - Here's a link to Svetlana showing several Spice models for tubes . A couple of other great sites are Duncan's site (referenced by the Svetlana page) and the " PAEng " site .

'Spose I could have just copied the models to my local disk, but maybe some of you will find them to be interesting. Besides, I probably would have just lost them again.

Wayne

DAC's output into Transformers...

66.222.197.69


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email  Next ] [ Digital Drive ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by onestrikeforce on January 08, 2003 at 13:45:38

Somebody ask...DAC's output into Transformers.
The idea sounds good, but...
Many dac's happen to be of current mode output nature, and like to look into a virtual ground. Audio nirvana is, I'm afraid, not that simple. Does it in general work? Of course! I can live with reduced bass, if the rest is of pristine musical quality. But that's my cup of tea.

Here is some info.

http://www.audiodesignguide.com/
http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/pae.htm
http://www.lundahl.se/


Have a good one,
onestrikeforce

Re: what about between phillips 6922 and BB's 6dj8's

192.61.17.225


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Tubes Asylum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by Sondek ( A ) on September 23, 2002 at 16:18:49

In Reply to: Re: what about between phillips 6922 and BB's 6dj8's posted by JFB on September 23, 2002 at 14:49:51:

JFB,

If you're interested the link will take you to the Russian decoder.

·        http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/russian_numbering_system.htm

6c46

195.109.155.71


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Tubes Asylum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by Bas Horneman ( A ) on December 20, 2002 at 00:33:18

In Reply to: 6C46 posted by jake10000 on December 19, 2002 at 21:09:28:

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/high_sigma_vacuum_tubes_part2.htm

·        http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/high_sigma_vacuum_tubes_part2.htm



Re: 6c45p pre amp "With Output Transformer" (WOT). ?

68.69.90.52


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Tube DIY Asylum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by AnandR on March 30, 2003 at 11:46:29

In Reply to: 6c45p pre amp "With Output Transformer" (WOT). ? posted by Zeno on March 30, 2003 at 10:48:25:

There are tons:

See www.aloha-audio.com, and scroll to Espressivo preamp.
See http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/one_tube_design_page_CIRCUITS.htm

Or just do a search on www.google.com

Best,
Anand.

Re: is there any different between 6C45 & 6S45 pe

151.27.174.255


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Tube DIY Asylum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by PAEng ( A ) on March 22, 2003 at 07:57:21

In Reply to: is there any different between 6C45 & 6S45 pe posted by Zeno on March 11, 2003 at 07:34:31:

PE stands also for a Special Quality Tube with 10.000 hours of
guaranteed operation!


is there any different between 6C45 & 6S45 pe

161.142.100.81


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Tube DIY Asylum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by Zeno ( A ) on March 11, 2003 at 07:34:31

In Reply to: Power amplifier with ONE tube posted by RM on March 10, 2003 at 14:49:13:

there is a PSE design at http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/pae.htm look very interesting, i am deciding on a design to build, just got my 6c45 tubes. more suggestion are much appreciated either on pre or amp

thanks


Re: Building a DIY battery phono stage

24.154.39.178


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Tweaker's Asylum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by MG16 ( A ) on December 07, 2001 at 17:34:02

In Reply to: Building a DIY battery phono stage posted by Michael Amster on December 07, 2001 at 16:19:52:


Heres one I am currently building. From Glass Audio.
http://digilander.iol.it/paeng/a_pspiced_low.htm

Re: Wow (Philips SACD-1000)

172.135.218.249


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email ] [ Bottlehead Forum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by AnandR on December 08, 2002 at 17:05:20

In Reply to: Wow (Philips SACD-1000) posted by Benb on December 08, 2002 at 10:37:55:

Now all you need to do is replace the power supply diodes and caps with what reference audio mods uses (they have a parts list), superclock it and then replace the entire analog output stage with 1:2 output transformers (I wonder if Magnequest makes any that are small enough) and you'll really be cooking. For info on where to hook up 1:2 output transformers I would contact K&K audio, or Andre Ciuoffoli or Stephan Perugini (PAENG design - do a search) or anything the good ol doc can brew here and tada.......you're in business. Let us know what you do with this.

Anand.

Spice models for tubes

65.56.172.53


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  Email  Next ] [ Pi Speaker Forum ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by Wayne Parham ( M ) on November 30, 2002 at 02:05:31

Hello World!

I'm modeling tube amps and just spent a half hour looking for some Spice models I had for various tubes. I seem to have lost them somewhere, so that's not happening again - Here's a link to Svetlana showing several Spice models for tubes . A couple of other great sites are Duncan's site (referenced by the Svetlana page) and the " PAEng " site .

'Spose I could have just copied the models to my local disk, but maybe some of you will find them to be interesting. Besides, I probably would have just lost them again.

Wayne

Da:DIY ZONE (service@my3c.net)
Oggetto:DIY ZONE
新增一篇文章6C45 SE單端管機實做

Questo è l'unico articolo trovato nella sequenza

View: Original Format

Newsgroups:tw.bbs.rec.pet
Data:2003-06-30 11:18:14 PST

DIY ZONE新增一篇文章(6C45 SE單端管機實做)
 

SOVTEK 6C45Π-E有何神奇之處?這款由前蘇聯釋出的軍規NOS三極管擁有不可思議的超
低輸出阻抗、高頻寬與低失真,在客觀特性上更與夢幻般的WE437高度趨近,推動能力
超強,不僅可以建構一部輸出功率1W以上的單管後級,更能作為300B2A3211的驅動
級,當然,如果當成前級使用,也是絕妙的選擇。
 

在加拿大網友Wenchieh 的建議下,DZ以義大利PAENG Design的原設計為基礎,並在PCB
規劃上略施巧思,讓他6C45SE為一塊可以擔任前級或後級、甚至是驅動板的完整套件。
在本篇文章中,除了由網友撰寫的裝機說明之外,也包含了一篇經過PAENG Design授權
的分析專文,文章簡潔,但包含了重要的Pspice分析數據,對於有心以CAD深入分析管
機的朋友來說,倒是一篇很好的參考。
 

DIY ZONE for Audio
http://www.diyzone.net
音響DIY的大本營,有DIY討論區,歡迎加入會員!
 

Da:Larry W4CSC (nospam@home.com)
Oggetto:Re: Filament Resistor with 6H6 or 6AL5

View: Complete Thread (16 articoli)

Original Format

Newsgroups:rec.antiques.radio+phono

Data:2003-05-14 19:37:54 PST

>

>

>Fascinating.

>

>A Google search yielded this interesting paper, a survey of vacuum

>tube Spice models, some of which involve diode contact potential:

>

>http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/spice_models_for_vacuum_tubes.htm

>

>Brian
 

Larry

Da:Anatoly Parhomenko (Anatoly.Parhomenko@p1.f85.n5002.z2.fidonet.org)
Oggetto:Re: url

View: Complete Thread (3 articoli)

Original Format

Newsgroups:fido7.su.hardw.audio
Data:2003-02-10 09:46:05 PST

  
─═╬═╪──────── ─╪──── ─── ── ─  Hello, Sasha!
  ╟─╬─09 Feb 03 в 03:45, писал Sasha Shost к All:
  │ │
  
 

 SS> http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm
 SS> всякое там...
Вот кстати, Итальяшки молодцы не боятся свое творчество в сети выставлять...
 

 │ Всего...                            Anatoly. -=[+IRON+]=-

Da:RF (listaco@terra.es)
Oggetto:Re: ¿Quieres aprender electronica para HIFI?

View: Complete Thread (2 articoli)

Original Format

Newsgroups:es.ciencia.electronica
Data:2002-11-10 14:25:48 PST

> Si estas interesado en temas de electronica relacionados

> con la amplificación a válvulas,te puedo dar clases

> por internet.
 

Pues muchas gracias JM.
 

En este grupo hay un par de habituales valvuleros (como KT88 gusta

llamarse). El otro es Luis MCP que hace mucho que no escribe, y

gracias a su pagina de internet http://personales.ya.com/lcardaba/

empecé a sentir curiosidad con las válvulas.

 

El caso es que tenía tanta curiosidad que pregunté en rec.audio.tubes

(un grupo excepcional) por tubos con una tensión de anodo menor de

200V. Y al final me he hecho con una ECC86 :-)

 

Es un tubo de muy baja tensión de anodo (minimo 6V, máximo 30V).

Utilizada en un receptor de radio en la revista elektor diseñada por

B. Kainka (un habitual de elektor) en cuya pagina de internet he

encontrado el datasheet de Valvo con información muy completa.

 

Leí en algún sitio que con las valvulas muy antiguas es conveniente

hacer pasar la corriente por el filamento sin aplicarle tensión al

los demás terminales para que así cualquier gas residual que haya se

vuelva a solidificar en el getter. No sé cuantas horas recomendaban

dejarla de este modo. A las 2 horas perdí la paciencia, tenía unas

ganas enormes de probarla.

 

Es muy curioso ver el encendido inicial. Tengo una fuente con tensión

variable y limitador de intensidad con voltimetro y amperimetro

digital. La ECC86 es un doble triodo con filamentos de 6'3V y 330 mA.

Uno de los triodos se pone al rojo cuando llega a 5.8V, el otro (que

lo tengo sin conectar) cuando llega a 4'5V. Me he dado cuenta hace

poco, no sé si indica algún funcionamiento anormal. (Como soy nuevo

con esto, a mí cualquier cosa me parece curiosa)

 

Lo tengo conectado a un zócalo noval al que le he soldado unos trozos

de cable para poder hacer pruebas en una placa de prototipos. Tenía

pensado hacerle unas fotos ponerlo en alguna web antes de comentar

nada en rec.audio.tubes o aquí, pero ya que has escrito esto ...

 

Ahora mismo lo tengo montado con un triodo a la entrada en emisor

común y después un BD139 en seguidor de emisor para dar corriente

mediante un electrolitico de 470uF a un altavoz de 8 ohmios de 96 dB.

La entrada está conectada a la salida 'phono' de una cadena de sonido.

He conseguido el modelo spice de la ECC86 en internet, de un lugar

muy interesante:

 

  http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/triode_models.htm

 

La unica pega es que solo puedo hacer simulaciones hasta 10 voltios

de anodo, ya que a partir de esta cifra el modelo no se corresponde

con la realidad. No me he complicado con los valores de las

resistencias de anodo y catodo, he puesto unas similares a las que

indica el datasheet. Tengo la rejilla acoplada con un condensador

de 2'2uF y una Rg de 100K. La resistencia de catodo es 500 ohmios, y

la de ánodo 5K. (Aunque he probado Rk 800 y Ra 10K sin problemas).

 

El caso es que estoy pensando en eliminar el condensador de entrada

ya que los niveles de tensión de una salida de auriculares no creo

que sea mayor de 100mV, aunque no lo he probado todavía (para esto

me he creado un rectificador doblador de tensión con diodos schottky,

pero esto es otra larga historia ...) y tambien he pensado en añadir

una resistencia en serie de 300 o 600 ohmios a la rejilla. Según

tengo entendido el adaptar la impedancia puede reducir bastante el

ruido y la distorsión, pero no sé muy bien como hacerlo.

 

Bueno, podría estar varias horas escribiendo sobre esto pero no quiero

agotar vuestra paciencia. Voy a intentar subir los graficos de las

simulaciones a una web, perdonar por el excesivo tamaño de las imagenes

no se como reducirlas:

 

  http://www.terra.es/personal9/listaco/ecc86.htm

                     

Tambien puedes escribirme a mi direccion de correo para cualquier

cosa relacionada con este tema.

 

Un saludo.

 

PD: cuanto uno más aprende sobre los tubos de vacio más se asombra de

su sencillez y de sus prestaciones, y del concepto totalmente equivocado

que uno tenía sobre estas maravillas.

Posted by AlexK ( A ) on April 19, 2003 at 17:15:07

In Reply to: Paeng Projects, but no E55L posted by korneluk on April 19, 2003 at 16:43:45:

Hello Jose ,
go to devices , then to high u Tubes and then open part 1 on the paeng website . There is a list of possible tubes for this amps like EC 8020 , 3A167M , WE 437 and E55L in pseudotriode mode . I have done this with 60 ohm cathode resistor bypassed with 1000 uF and 140 volt plate voltage , then I have 55 mA current . I made this with a regulated power supply and it sounds amazing . The most simple "power" amp , I ´ve ever built . No hiss , no hum and no oszillation , I have used grid stoppers , ferrite beads and very short wires .
Regards , AlexK.

Posted by korneluk ( A ) on April 19, 2003 at 16:43:45

In Reply to: Re: Source of 6C45s? E55L/8233 posted by AlexK on April 19, 2003 at 11:53:00:

Alex,

I found the PAEng website, but there is no mention of the E55L tube. Do you have any more information, I am curious?

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

-- jose k.


·        PAEng Projects

Posted by AlexK ( A ) on April 19, 2003 at 11:53:00

In Reply to: Source of 6C45s? posted by korneluk on April 19, 2003 at 06:31:56:

Hello Jose ,
I have built such an one stage amp with a E 55 L in triode mode , input with old studio transformers 1:2 , gridstopper , the tube , cathode resistor and output transformer , thats all . Look at the italian websites under www.paeng.it .
Regards , AlexK.

Posted by groverg ( A ) on May 01, 2003 at 22:27:07

In Reply to: Brook 12A posted by molecularman on May 01, 2003 at 20:38:30:

Take a look at this site, there's a nice article about the circuit, and the schematic is easy to read:

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/the_examination_of_the_brook_amp.htm

It's a lovely-sounding amp. I would think that with a tube rectifier like a GZ37 or 5R4 a 600VCT/200mA tranny would get you there. With a lower-drop rectifier like 5AR4 you might need a 550VCT.

Posted by AnandR on March 30, 2003 at 11:46:29

In Reply to: 6c45p pre amp "With Output Transformer" (WOT). ? posted by Zeno on March 30, 2003 at 10:48:25:

There are tons:

See www.aloha-audio.com, and scroll to Espressivo preamp.
See http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/one_tube_design_page_CIRCUITS.htm

Or just do a search on www.google.com

Best,
Anand.

Posted by PAEng ( A ) on March 22, 2003 at 07:57:21

In Reply to: is there any different between 6C45 & 6S45 pe posted by Zeno on March 11, 2003 at 07:34:31:

PE stands also for a Special Quality Tube with 10.000 hours of
guaranteed operation!

Posted by Zeno ( A ) on March 11, 2003 at 07:34:31

In Reply to: Power amplifier with ONE tube posted by RM on March 10, 2003 at 14:49:13:

there is a PSE design at http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/pae.htm look very interesting, i am deciding on a design to build, just got my 6c45 tubes. more suggestion are much appreciated either on pre or amp

thanks

Posted by Garland ( A ) on June 13, 2003 at 10:09:01

Tube design site

·        http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/design_frame.htm

 

Interesting site - good reading for a rainy day!

 

Posted by mfc ( A ) on June 26, 2003 at 18:23:54

In Reply to: I still think so... posted by Charles Hansen on June 26, 2003 at 17:12:27:

I'm still in :)

Here is a good link showing how closely related a follower is
to NFB.

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/design_frame.htm
click on cathode follower

The output signal in the follower case and the NFB case consists
of a power series, indicating harmonic multiplication.

What I think you may be getting at is that if the follower device
itself is very linear, then the harmonic multiplication maybe
low in scale and thus hard to hear (although I don't like the way
they sound).

Mike

Posted by Gary Kaufman ( A ) on July 18, 2003 at 08:14:38

In Reply to: Looking for a GOOD 211 / VT4-C Schematic posted by Super_BQ on July 17, 2003 at 23:47:58:

Don't believe everything you read about high B+ and transmitting triodes. Many folks have been using 845's at low B+ with good results.

I played around with 211's and finally settled on a B+ of 825v, 60ma as an operating point. It gave me all of the power I needed and sounded wonderful. It also allowed me to use some "reasonable sized" 15uf/1000v oil caps instead of a few much larger parts I had.

I was more impressed at the sonic differences made by altering the current than the B+. Also the power supply made a substantial difference - liberal use of swinging/smoothing chokes and smallish oil caps sounded way better than larger banks of electrolytics. I'm not sure the 866jr's made any sonic difference, but they sure looked better!

My circuit is very similar to PAE's (see link below)

The single stage driver is sweet and works well.

Mikey's FS-100's are fantastic.



·        http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/211_6c45_SE_AMP.htm   (Open in New Window)


Posted by mg16 ( A ) on July 17, 2003 at 16:46:12

In Reply to: Looking for Pre-amp schematics/kit posted by seeking soundstage on July 17, 2003 at 14:58:02:

Hi,
Bottlehead Foreplay is very good for a couple hundred bucks.
Another hundred or so for the mods available, and it becomes a really great sounding line12au7 line stage. IMO
Another great diy preamp I have tried is the Curcio mods for Dynaco Pas3's. $55 for line, phono, and regulator boards each. Stuff them yourself, and replace the Pas's boards. Can get a nice Pas for under $200 to use as a base.
A strictly from scatch , battery powered , 7308 tube project is here. Click on battery powered line and/or phono project. I built it last year, and it sounds very nice.

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm
mg16


Posted by mfc ( A ) on July 10, 2003 at 19:24:20

In Reply to: Primer on Paralelled Triodes posted by HKL on July 10, 2003 at 07:40:02:

Here ya go

·        http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/one_tube_design_page_PSE_Mismatch.htm

Posted by NewTube on July 07, 2003 at 00:58:14

Hello,
I am finding out for the good schematic of line preamplifier for tube 6H30Pi, Could you please recommend some schematic for me? I found 1 shematic on the PAE website as attached.

http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm

Now I have 2 tube of 6H30Pi already.

Best Regards,



·        http://digilander.libero.it/paeng/projects_frame.htm