Interview to..... Jaye Foucher |
Interview by Roberto Guarnieri
Tell me something about
your first experience with guitar....
When I was 17
years old I had a month during the summer where I was not working or going to
school, and I decided to learn to play the guitar during this free time. I had
been playing piano since the age of 7 but had wanted to learn to play guitar
for many years. We had an old nylon-string classical guitar in the house, and
I taught myself to play chords by looking at chord diagrams on some of the sheet
music I had. Within a few weeks I wanted to learn more, so I started taking
lessons with a local guitar teacher. Less than a month later I bought an inexpensive
electric guitar and small amp. By the end of that summer I was learning solos
and rock songs, and knew that playing guitar was what I wanted to do with my
life.
There was some particular
cd that has influenced you and why?
I would say Dream Theater's Images and Words CD influenced me more than anything
else has. For many years I had been really focused on the neo-classical guitar
playing style, but had started to move away from that on my own. When I heard
DT's cd with their odd time signatures and the jazz/fusion-influenced style
of John Petrucci I was totally intrigued.
As woman, have you found
more difficulties in music business?
Absolutely. There was a lot of skepticism about women in rock back when I first
started. Now it is not so uncommon to see women rockers, but 15 years ago there
were hardly any female rock guitarists, and those that were out there were not
all that great at soloing. My goal was to change that. But I had to put up with
a lot of people telling me that girls would never be able to play as well as
or as fast as the male guitarists out there. And people would automatically
assume I was in or should be in an all-girl band, as if women weren't good enough
to play alongside men. But a lot has changed over the years, and now it is much
more accepted to be a woman rock guitarist, and I very rarely ever come across
the type of prejudice and disbelief that I saw back when I first started. There
have also been a lot of advantages to being a woman though. I've had opportunities
that I may not have gotten just because I was a woman, and I know I've gotten
more media attention because of it. Being a woman in a male-dominated field
made me stand-out in the crowd of thousands of guitarists. So for all the difficulties
I've faced, I've always been able to see the benefits of being a woman guitarist
and I've used those to help me succeed.
What about Jennifer
Batten?
Jennifer has done wonders for helping to boost the image of women guitarists.
I admire her both for her playing skills and the fact that she also overcame
the same type of difficulties and prejudices that I faced.
You are the chief of Guitarappalooza, one of the most important reality > on internet, how you decide to promote some guitarists?
I honestly came up with the idea merely to promote my own music. I wanted to expand my fanbase by combining my mailing list with the mailing lists of other instrumental rock guitarists. So I came up with a plan that allowed 6 of us guitarists to combine mailing lists and put out 1 single newsletter that featured all of us. The initial 6 guitarists that were involved were myself, Neil Zaza, Alex Skolnick, Jon Finn, Joe Bochar and Jennifer Batten. In the second issue Andy Timmons and Ron Thal joined us. After we put out the 3rd issue of the newsletter we were gaining so much interest from other guitarists wishing to join that we decided to switch from mailing a print newsletter to doing a webzine so that we could add as many guitarists as we wanted without worrying about the size of the newsletter growing too large and unmanageable. After that, it just took off!
I think that the scene
of instrumental guitar is more various respect 10 years ago.
Yes I agree. It is also more underground than it was back in the 1980's and
90's. There is still a market for instrumental guitar music, but it is much
harder to succeed at it. The internet, of course, has helped out a great deal
in keeping the instrumental music scene alive.
About your cd's, which
message are you trying to explain?
I don't really think about giving people a message with my music... when I'm
writing I'm simply thinking about writing tunes that people enjoy listening
to. That's really my only goal for the music: create a song that is enjoyable
to listen to with a melody that makes the listener feel something -- whether
it is sadness, excitement, joy, etc.
The duality between tecnique
and feeling is old as the world, what is your opinion?
I've always been of the opinion that you can be a technical player and still
play with feeling. I think it's a lot easier to become a technical player than
it is to learn to play with feeling, however, so I think a lot of players get
really good technically but don't ever learn the feeling part. Very few players
are both, but I definately think it can be done. Look at John Petrucci: there's
a player who has amazing technical abilities but whose solos are FULL of feeling.Recently
i have worked with Jeff Kollman and Neil Zaza, two guitarists > with a great
feeling. I'm not familiar with Jeff Kollman, but Neil is indeed a great guitarist
and songwriter. Neil is another example of someone who has great technical ability
but also plays with a lot of feeling.
Returning to you cd's,
is there some particular composition you love better than others?
I think my absolute favorite is "What Comes Around" on the second
album.It's my favorite to play and to listen to.
How many copies could
sell now in USA a very good instrumental cd?
It all depends on distribution and advertising budget. If you had good distribution,
your cds were in major record stores, you were able to get on some sort of tour
as an opening act, and you had a really good advertising budget and were able
to get the word out and get some airplay then I think you could sell 3000-5000
cds. But for those of us without major distribution or major advertising budgets,
the best we can hope for is maybe 1,000 over a period of a couple of years.
I have seen that a lot
of guitarists are more into fusion tunes than in > the past, why?
Well if you want
to be challenged technically and mentally as a rock guitar player and you don't
want to play the neo-classical style, which in my opinion is outdated and overdone,
then you would naturally turn to the other styles of music that are technically,
mentally, and physically challenging -- jazz and fusion -- and incorporate those
styles into your rock playing.
What is your opinion
about magazines like Guitar Player and Guitar World ?
You forgot Guitar
One! I think all of those magazines are important to guitarists, both in keeping
a person up to date on what is happening in the music/guitar scene, what equipment
is current and out there, and all 3 magazines help to teach guitarists new techniques
and songs. I did a lot of learning from guitar magazines in my early years as
a player. And I'll still use the transcriptions they provide if I want to learn
a particular song... I can certainly learn a song by ear if I want to, but if
someone else has already done the work for me I'm just as happy to learn it
from tablature!!
Is there now a guitarist
that you think could be eexplode on very high levels very soon?
I wish I could answer that but I can't. Frankly, I think the days of great guitar
players exploding onto the music scene at a high level of exposure are over
at this point. These days the guitarists you see featured on the front of guitar
magazines aren't guitar hero material, or at least not what I'd consider to
be guitar heros. They're good at what they do, but they're certainly no Nuno
or George [Lynch] or Eddie [Van Halen]. And I think it'll be some time yet before
the music scene turns around and guitarists who've spent years learning to be
great players are once again admired for their playing skills.