Stalker's Home Page Get Your FBI File Full Disclosure Live (My weekly Radio Show) Public Sources of SSN's | pisanino.unipi.it Oil City, PA! Turn OFF the Filters! Your Views on the News! FREE Classified Ads Community Opinions! (Censored by CyberPatrol) Glen Roberts, Internet Entrepreneur | Complete Systems & Parts A Few Programs for your PC For Your Web Page Other Cool Stuff Investigative Books GPS For your Laptop! |
The Mayor of Oil City, PA has questioned my promotion of the City. Click on Oil City to see what the fuss is about! Advertise here! (1263800 ads displayed!)-- Master Index of all Glen L. Roberts Pages! | ||
The Stalker's Home Page! She had no privacy! You have
no privacy!
The Di Conspiracy Home Page -- Check out
the latest story!
Words of a Serial Killer -- Banned by AOL
Where you can comment on the top news stories of
the week and read others uncensored viewpoints! Community
Opinions Where your voice can be heard -- maybe. A local school district
has blocked access to this page... but look on it for a dirty picture site that
access is allowed to! What is their objective?
Losers!
They relied on a database and LOST!
From: Bild Zeitung
Please press submit ONLY ONCE!
The Dutch Newspaper, The Daily Planet has covered this site twice this week (9/19/97). Not being able to read Dutch, I can only read between the lines so to speak. However, it appears in the second article that they are directing people to a French Fire Fighter's Site -- to help people see if the above looks like French Firemen. Can't someone create a picture that uses French Firemen, or replace the firemen above? Is technology to the point where we only know if something is real or not, based on what we already know? Is what we already know the truth... or is a photo the truth?
Paparazzi Photos Of Princess Diana's Crash Where are they... as soon as
we can get them... they will appear here! Who knows if we can get them.
Fake Photo Contest The Full Disclosure Live Radio Show (broadcast on World Wide Shortwave) is sponsoring the Diana Fake Photo Contest. The above photo has been ripped apart by many views of this page (though there are many believers). It has certainly kept right in line with Full Disclosure's objectives of highlighting the risks of technology. The need for a first hand understanding of the capabilities of technology. Full Disclosure will offer a US$100 prize to the best fake. Entries with be arbitrarily judged by Full Disclosure and its consultants. The best three will be posted on this site, for final judging by the public. In the final judging only one vote per IP address will be accepted. We would expect to start the final judging around Dec 15, 1997 (this date may change depending on the number of entries). Final judging will be in effect for one month. Entries should be emailed to photo@fulldisclosure.org as an attached file. You can also mail entries to: Full Disclosure Photo Contest, P.O. Box 1533-C, Oil City, Pa., 16301, U.S.A. Make sure to include your name and address for payment of prize. If you wish to remain anonymous, please include the name and address of your favoriate charity for the prize to be given to. Note! Your entry does not need to be an alteration of the above. Use your imagination. We will set up a page to preview some of the entries and rotate them though... but you have to wait for the voting. Is reality real, or has technology eliminating the line between fact and fiction? Input Field: pic1 Response: fake ___________________________________________________ Input Field: comments Response: I think the idea of a "Fake Crash Photos Contest" is a good one! * * Clog the net with so many "Fake" images, and no one will believe * * the authentics when they some out! Then, the Photographers who had * * the nerve to photograph a dying woman won't get rich from her death! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Input Field: pic1 Response: real ___________________________________________________ Input Field: comments Response: It is appalling that such photographs should be available to anyone on the Net and that your organisation should be responsible for submitting them for public view. I, unfortunately, had to access them in order to validate my research as a member of a regulatory organisation. I feel sick. An ordinary member of public would have been 'cleaned up' by the undertakers before he or she would have been on view to loved ones. This woman, be she Princess or Jane Doe, was dying. How dare the photographers or you, as an allegedly responsible mechanism on the Net, make these intensely private moments public domain? There are limits, are there not, to the commercial advantage gained against the restrictions of public decency? If you are not going to regulate the Net and its activities, someone surely will. It may well be us. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sender: audi.demon.co.uk (158.152.120.250) Client: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.0a; Windows 3.1) Of course, this page is not commercial! Look at the money CBS made from showing the cover of the Bild Zeitung Newspaper with the little picture (shown above), telling their audience to turn away! Or, CBS 48 Hours, last night (9/18/97), showing pictures of smashed up cars and repeatedly showing a body being taken away! |
Join in Efnet channel #fulldisclosure in IRC.
Here are some irc servers to try irc.cs.cmu.edu irc1.phoenix.net irc.voicenet.com irc.vol.com irc.mo.net irc-w.primenet.com irc.sprynet.com irc.nol.net irc.mcs.net
Used in Search Engines to find these pages (Notice! Offensive Content) |
Main Page -- It starts here! Send Feedback@glr.com |
Links to Top 100 pages with links to these pages! |
You are Visitor # Here Since 08/31/97!
Justice Powell wrote, in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323,339-40 (1974), "[u]nder the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas." Here, the Court's opinion includes a footnote: "As Thomas Jefferson made the point in his first Inanugural Address: 'If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it'." Earlier this Century, Justice Holmes added to his dissent in U.S. v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644,655-55 (1929), "if there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought -- not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate." |