CONDOMINIUM TR> The intercom The installation of a new plant of intercom in an unprovided building results in a non remarkable expense and not voluptuary, in how much the intercom is a service by now entered diffused way in the cohabitation of the condominium. Therefore il dissentient condòmino cannot be exonerated by to participate in the expenses.. Both the expenses of installation and of management him ripartiscono in equal parts, being the homogeneous use for every apartment. Different case concerns the videointercom, above all when a plant normal citofonico already exists. In this case the necessary majority for the deliberation is that of the art.1136 c.c., paragraph 5 or the majority of the condòminis that represent the 2/3 bystanders of the millesimis of the building. Nevertheless, since such plant reenters among the innovations that determined an improvement they are verifiable the extreme of the gravosità foreseen by the art. 1121 Civil.Code, then it is possible for the condòminio that are found dissentient around the deliberation of approval, not to participate in the expenses of installation, so much an use is todayer possible separate of the circuit video and audio. it is obvious that in whatever moment the dissentient condòmino can change mind and to ask to also be laced video to the circuit. In such case it will contribute to the costs of installation and maintenance, also past. If you desire a close examination on this matter, send us your application information click here. You our editing will respond within 24-48 hours..  S i t o     c o n f o r m e     a l     C o d i c e     D e o n t o l o g i c o      F o r e n s e                                                      Webmaster: Michele Curatolo