University
of Rome III - Degree in Languages &
International Communication - Convener: Patrick
Boylan - Academic year 2006-07
COURSE:
English I * OCI+LL,
English III* LL,
English III* OCI
<Circle
one
*for
English minors
TASK N° _0_
Due date: 07/03/07 Group
Leader: _________________ <Use
BLOCK LETTERS
Group:
A B C
D E F
G H I
J K L
M N <Circle
a letter
Workbook Evaluation Sheet –
Section 1
GROUP LEADERS:
WRITE NAMES USING BLOCK LETTERS.
WRITE STUDENTS' NAMES ON LINE, CIRCLE POINTS FOR EACH CATEGORY, GIVE TOTAL.
1.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
2.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
3.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
4.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
5.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
6.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Group Leader's signature________________________________
INSTRUCTIONS
NOTE: WHEN YOU RETURN THE
EVALUATION SHEET TO THE TEACHER,
DO NOT INCLUDE THIS
SHEET: KEEP IT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
FORM:
1 = Easy to read, neat, precise responses for each
video
Margins as indicated below:
0
= Sloppy, handwritten, disorganized presentation, or poor page
layout.
CONTENT There are four categories;
students get 0 or 1 point in each category.
(a.) The
ethnographic questions are excellent and include both Hofstede's
dimensions and more intuitive “empathetic” questioning
= 1. The ethnographic questions are done superficially =
0.
(b.) The ethnographic questions include all three types
described by Spradley. = 1. The questions do not include all
three types. = 0
(c.) The translations of the ethnographic
questions and of the Sociometric Questionnaire are excellent; in
addition, there are predictions for each. = 1.
The translation is poor and/or there are not predictions for every
question.. = 0.
(d.) The results of the interviews with
Italian subjects are presented quantitatively for the Sociometric
Interview and qualitatively for the ethnographic interrogation. =
1. The conclusions show no distinction between
kinds of knowledge. = 0.
Group Leaders can add a comment after a student's mark if they want, but it is not necessary.