University
of Rome III - Degree in Languages &
International Communication - Convener: Patrick
Boylan - Academic year 2006-07
COURSE:
English I * OCI+LL,
English III* LL,
English III* OCI
<Circle
one
*for
English minors
TASK N° _1_
Due date: 16/03/07 Group
Leader: _________________ <Use
BLOCK LETTERS
Group:
A B C
D E F
G H I
J K L
M N <Circle
a letter
Workbook Evaluation Sheet –
Sections 2,3
GROUP
LEADERS: WRITE NAMES USING BLOCK LETTERS.
WRITE STUDENTS' NAMES ON LINE, CIRCLE POINTS FOR EACH CATEGORY, GIVE TOTAL.
1.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
2.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
3.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
4.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
5.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
6.
_________________________ Form = 0 1 Content
= 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 Total
= __
Comment:
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Group Leader's signature________________________________
INSTRUCTIONS
FORM: 1 = Easy to read, neat,
precise responses. Format (name, etc.) and margins
as above.
0
= Sloppy, handwritten, disorganized presentation, or poor layout,
information missing.
CONTENT
(a.) Section
2: Video and Body Language Checklist: All body signals are
given and, for each, a hypothesis of the meaning. = 1.
Not all signals are given or not all are accompanied with a
hypothesis of meaning = 0.
(b.) Section 2: “ CRITICAL
INCIDENT”: A good answer will not be just a personal
opinion! Or a 50/50 compromise to be diplomatic. It will show a real
feeling for the French woman's situation... AND a real feeling for
the American man's situation; both will be right for “good”
reasons (“good” within their respective cultures). So
the defense of one of the two (the one that the student agrees with more) will also
show that the other person's position is a good one, too. = 1. The
student defends the person chosen for purely personal opinions or
tries to be diplomatic with a 50/50 compromise. = 0
(c.)
Section 2: Video “Passport Control” : The student
shows an understanding of the notion “accommodation” and
shows that the Arab man in the video began really to accommodate when
he stopped accommodating to the Israeli way of dressing and acting.
= 1. The student does not
show an understanding of the notion “accommodation” and
how it can seem positive or negative. = 0.
(d.) Section
3: “Predictions” The student formulates
predictions for the answers to the Group's questions and shows that
s/he understands at least 1 of the 3 reasons given why “experimental”
findings are not necessarily conclusive. = 1. The student
gives her/his predictions but does not seem to be aware of how
fragile they are and why they are fragile. = 0
Group Leaders can add a short comment after a student's mark to justify the mark given (one or two sentences)..