DIFFERENTIAL PHOTOMETRY OF COMETS

T. Scarmato1

 

1 – Toni Scarmato’s  Observatory, San Costantino di Briatico, Calabria, Italy

ABSTRACT

 

Here we present the results obtained with three comets 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann B the component B, 6P/d’Arrest and C/2008 J1 (Boattini). Comet 73P was observed in April 2006 with a CCD camera Starlight Express SXL8 attached to direct heat of a Newton telescope 250 mm, focal length 1200 mm, while the 6P and C/2008 J1 were ever observed by telescope Newtonian but with a CCD camera Atik 16IC to direct heat. CCD room was added a filter photometric Rc (Schuler). For the 6P has been used a defocus of 14 pixels, meaning that the central nucleus of Counterfeiting has defocused a FWHM of 14 pixels. The technical data of the tools used are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Over the past 10 years the survey conducted on Earth by comets is that space has revealed that these vagabonds of the area have unique characteristics and not all behave the same way and not all have the same composition. It 'been discovered that in addition to the "classical" code of Ions and dust, comets may produce code of sodium and lately has been observed in comet C/2006 P1 an IRON NEUTRAL TAIL.

(Fulle et al. 2007; See the link http://digilander.libero.it/infosis/homepage/astronomia/c2006p1.htm)
One of the ways, and the scope of instruments amateur, to observe comets is the visual observations. Depending on the brightness of the comet (magnitude) just a simple binoculars to be able to admire the comets. Until a few years ago the dedicated amateur astronomers are so profitable enough to estimate the magnitude of visual comets, which can be done based on certain methods. One of these, described simply, is to defocus the coma of the comet to make the surface uniform brightness and then if in the instrument field there are some stars brighter and fainter since the comet, comparing the brightness of the comet with that of the stars defocused that you know the magnitude and then make an estimate of the apparent magnitude of the comet. (See ICQ - http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/icq/icq.html for more informations). These estimates and allow themselves to still provide the photometric evolution of the comet, even though the reserve of comets with beautiful surprises "outburst" (increases brightness) that evolve both short and medium and long term.  This suggests that comets are bodies active AND RETAIN and probably even when they seem really quiet in the area continues to issue material in the coma, which then expands into space, ALSO AT GREAT DISTANCE FROM SUN.  One of the most interesting is that of a comet 29P a periodic comet showing a very interesting activities for more than 6 U. A. from the Sun with outburst that could be periodic. Again, however, the mechanism underlying its behaviour has not been explained satisfactorily and scientifically certified.
The issuance of this material change continuously over time in terms of foliage and thus its brightness.  We can ask; It can observe the changes in brightness of foliage even when they are small?  And what is the accuracy of the measures that need to be able to have a meeting in observation of hours detect variations in brightness?  It is possible with amateur instruments to reach levels of accuracy in measuring the magnitude and possibly other parameters to monitor in the short to medium term evolution of photometric hair of a comet or, if this is far from the sun and "apparently" inactive, the brightness variation of the "core"?
To answer these questions may come to the aid PHOTOMETRY DIFFERENTIAL.
The differential photometry, applied to the transit of extrasolar planets, has shown that with amateur instruments can reach accuracies thousandths of magnitude. There are many transits observed with this technique and a very difficult transit was discovered by amateur instruments. This is HD 17156b (Barbieri et al. 2007), whose brightness variation is only magnitudes 0.005. (In Fig. 1 you can see the change in the brightness of a star that is suspect the existence of a planet transit).

 

 

Fig. 1: The peak negative visible in the figure shows the change in magnitude of a star  probably

due to the transit of a planet in front of the star.

The depth is about 8 thousandths of magnitude with an rms of 0.005 magnitudes.
The shots were made with a Newton aperture 250  mm,  focal length 1200  mm,  Atik 16IC CCD camera

and filter Rc photometric (for characteristics see table 2).

 

To make differential photometry is necessary to collect as many photons from the sources and then compare the resulting figures. As the number of photons that gather for a given source crucially depends on its brightness, if a source emits a steady stream, the number of photons that arrive at our detector will be settled within experimental error due to various causes, such as variation environmental conditions, temperature, etc ... velature
If instead a source does not emit a steady stream, the number of photons that arrive will vary over time. If the change is small, for example in the order of thousandths of magnitude, then it can detect it is necessary to compare the flow of variable source with the stable flow of sources. Let us therefore refer to a simple formula which calculates the relationship between the flow of the star in question and the total flow of other reference sources said.
(See next par.)

 

Tab.1: CCD camera’s characteristics

Parameters

STARLIGHT EXPRESS SXL8

ATIK 16IC

Area in Pixel array

512X512 (262.144 pixels squares)

659X494 (325,546 pixels squares)

Pixel size

15x15 micron

7.4x7.4 micron

Full well depth

150.000e

40.000e

Dark current

1e per second a  -30°C

<1e per second at -25°C

Peak spectral response

530nM, 50% a 400 nM e 650 nM

500 nM

Quantum efficiency

30% a 530 nM

>50% a 500 nM

A-D converter

12 bits

16 bits

Readout noise

<  20e

7e

Anti-blooming

Yes

yes

Cooling

Yes

yes

CCD Type

Philips FT12

Sony ICX-424AL

CCD size (area sensitive)

7.8x7.8 mm

4,8x3,7 mm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tab.2: Characteristics of the Telescope and Filter

Parameters

Telescope

 

Parameters

Filter Rc

Aperture

250 mm

 

Productor

Schuler

Focal Lenght

1200

 

Band

Larga

Scale with SXL8

2.57 arcsec/pixel

 

Lambada peak

5978 A

Scale with Atik16IC

1.26 arcsec/pixel

 

FWHM

1297 A

Optic

Newton

 

 

 

Type

Reflector

 

 

 

Fov with SXL8

22’x22’

 

 

 

Fov with Atik16IC

14’x11’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When calculating the scale relate to the formulas:

, ,

 

 

Where dim is the effective size of the chip of CCD camera.

 

 

 

PURPOSE OF RESEARCH

 

As we have said before in recent times has been demonstrated that even an amateur can achieve scientifically significant photometric astronomical objects and in particular in the detection of transits of extrasolar planets.
The technique is to resume telescope with CCD + filter R the star under investigation and field around it and then applying the differential photometry noted the decrease of magnitude of the star caused by the passage of the planet in front of it along the line of sight observers .
In order to apply the differential photometry is necessary to have other stars in possibly the same brightness as that under consideration concerned. When the series of images, as long as possible, at least 3 or April 4 hours, the images are reduced by the calibration files, dark, flat and if necessary the bias. The images are then calibrated with a small program (IRIS) to measure the number of ADU of the stars in the field.  When the measure for all the stars considered good according to their individual flows, the formula

 

 

This formula gives a relationship between the flow of the star under investigation and the total flow of the stars of reference. To normalize the values obtained, it is estimated the median and the relationship

 

 

It then constructs the graph using a linear function that provides the best fit for the data obtained.
If the star is magnitude <11, has been shown that the blurring of the telescope can increase the accuracy if the flow is sufficiently high crop that is at least equal to 70% of the dynamics of the CCD and less than 90%.  The blur is a method that allows you to collect the same number of photons but spread over an area greater than the CCD camera. In this way you have a question on homogeneous flow and shrinking the scintillation which increases the error on the measure. The bigger the brightness of the star must be greater focus to get more precise.  See results with transits.
For comets is not yet clear whether or not blur improves the accuracy of the measure. We will see a further example periodic comet on 6P who provided interesting results, however. Moreover, it is not a linear function used to rent the data, but is compared only flow from the comet with one of the stars of reference.  For this we must choose the right time of exposure. In general, the exposure time must take into account the number of photons collected during a single exposure. For comets is not yet possible to establish a formula that allows them to calculate with good precision, and then takes into account that the higher the ratio S/N (Signal to Noise), is the best measure of the flow from the comet.  The aim is to apply this technique to the study of comets photometric to show if you can reach the same levels of accuracy that are obtained in observing the transit and then see if the results are in agreement with those obtained using scientifically tested and accepted as valid.  We then compared the results with comets of varying magnitude shoot with and / or without blurring. This will enable us to understand if you should decide whether or not the blur on objects comet or whether it is better to opt for shooting without blur.

 

METHODOLOGY

 

The methodology is to compare the flow of the object under investigation with the flow of objects that are in the same field. Shooting as we said earlier should be made preferably with the filter for photometric R Johnson Cousin or, for that comets can isolate the issue in the band in which the dust that can be found in the hair of the comet transmit light coming from the Sun. The series should be longer possible, at least two hours and exposure times to have an S / N highest possible but taking into account that the comet has moved in the individual recovery. If the telescope on equatorial mount must be well aligned with the pole and must be minimized problems bending and tracing. We stress however that the images with objects can be moved measured as the total flow is always captured by the pixels of the room. It 'important not include windows opening to be such as to contain the flow but not too large to incorporate any background stars near the source.
The images will then be calibrated with the dark, the flat and if necessary by the bias. If it is possible we must maintain stable temperature of the room by at least 0.5 degrees. If you are unsure of what is most important series of darks during the shooting in order to mediate all the images and obtain a master dark refers to all possible temperatures occurred throughout the recovery.
Depending on the brightness of the comet, the 'quantum efficiency of the room and taking into account that the R photometric filter reduces the total quantity of photons arriving in the CCD compared to shoot without a filter, unless you have a formula to get the appropriate time optimum exposure, is bypassing the problem of doing tests with increasing exposure times from at least 60 seconds.
When the counting of ADU is equal to 70% of the level of saturation of the room then you can already proceed to capture the full range of images. If you want a better S / N must be taken into account both its motion of the comet that does not exceed 90% of the level of saturation of the room.
Once the images are made to their development, first of all calibrating them then with a program that can measure the ADU of individual items automatically, you get the count for each image. In our case was used IRIS. The program, once measured the individual sources in the individual images, providing an output file with dates in JD - ADU and the values of the objects for each image records in chronological order. (see Table 3)

 

Tab. 3: sample records with the data, measure,

in the first column is the Julian Date observation on each image, in subsequent

columns are the counts the object that you want the photometry of stars and reference

JD

FLUSSOJ1

REF1

REF2

2454718.3129500

21304

510508

44780

2454718.3136991

22548

521433

45027

2454718.3144502

22145

518231

39568

2454718.3152014

23422

515335

42985

2454718.3159549

22926

509435

42423

2454718.3167083

22180

512611

37962

2454718.3174618

25370

503666

43654

2454718.3182141

25005

512055

37463

2454718.3189653

21340

504458

38060

2454718.3197176

24238

499754

41179

2454718.3204699

23582

513459

46686

2454718.3212222

23654

510294

39781

2454718.3219745

21456

502620

38062

2454718.3227269

25412

507747

38987

2454718.3234792

23214

499630

35155

2454718.3242315

20154

498266

38123

2454718.3249838

20619

510332

37554

2454718.3257361

24418

493006

38936

2454718.3264884

22754

496654

40879

2454718.3272407

21454

493840

37073

 

 

Since the program can do so automatically photometry on only 5 items at a time, if you need more than 5 photometric objects, you get more than one file with the data of individual objects.  To put them together you can use Excel and then create a single file type. Txt to be able to develop a program of analysis of the curves of light. In our case was used GNUPlot. It then proceeds with the comparison between the flow of the object under investigation and the flow of the other items measured in the field. The formula described above

 

 

 

 

permit to obtain the values that are fitted by a linear function that determines the best performance of our points of the curve of light. The sum in the denominator to obtain a theoretical star whose flow is equal to the sum of the flows of individual stars. In this way you can build a chart that if precision is desired, highlights the brightness variations that appear as positive or negative peaks in the curve of light. (see first results).
As for the comets is not yet clear whether or not blur helps to increase the accuracy of the measures also bright comet, so this research will tell us what are the limits of the method of photometry differential applies to comets.
We will see in the next paragraph the results and then we will draw conclusions based upon qualitative and quantitative them.

 

 

FIRST RESULTS

 

Photometry of the Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann B

Here are the orbital elements of the component b of the comet 73/P.

 

Epoch 2006 May 25.0 TT = JDT 2453880.5

T 2006 June 7.92466 TT                                  MPC

q   0.9390718            (2000.0)            P               Q

n   0.18394396     Peri.  198.80779     -0,02873648     +0.98221260

a   3.0620506      Node    69.88766     -0,88989677     +0.05940885

e   0.6933193      Incl.   11.39726     -0,45525592     -0,17812634

P   5.36

 

Comet 73/P is a periodical that has fragmented several times in its repeated passes at perihelion. The various pieces are away from each other because of the initial thrust due to the process of fragmentation that still has not been explained fully.
The components brighter, the c and b, during the last passage to perihelion showed strong activity with further fragmentation and an interesting photometric evolution.

 

Fig.2: Comet 73/Pb resumed the evening of April 22, 2006

 

 

In the first decade of April the comet 73/P-b had an outburst resulting in fragmentation of the nucleus. In the evenings from April 20-24 was possible to see the piece that was seconded by the core and is slowly away towards South-West. (see Fig.2)
The repeated outburst and fragmentation have been registered by many observers.

(See link http://digilander.libero.it/infosis/homepage/astronomia/73p.htm)

For our analysis we chose the images of 28 April 2006 as b component was apparently quiet after a strong outburst occurred in the previous week. The series of images covering a time interval of about 2 hours.

 

 

Fig. 3: The comet 73/Pb resumed the evening of 28 April 2006.

On the left image was obtained with mediating

Astroart 150 frames for 30 sec each, and aligning on the photometric center of the comet.

On the right the same images have been mediated by aligning on the center of photometric stars.

The error of alignment is 1-2 pixels. Note that near the comet there are stars

in the field who do not have permission to use openings

more than 9 pixels as the counts were altered as a result of their presence.

 

The comet was at 0.147 U. A. from Earth and the heliocentric distance was 1104 U. A. Because of its proximity to Earth on its own motion of the comet was high, you could appreciate in a few minutes observing with a 7x50 binoculars. For this reason, the exposures were only 30 seconds each. The shots were made Newtonian telescope with a 250 mm aperture, focal length 1200 mm, with a CCD camera Starlight Express SXL8 Rc filter and direct fire. (for the complete system see Tables 1 and 2).  As we said in the introduction, for our purposes it is necessary that the comet is that the stars of reference remain the same field throughout the recovery. Consequently only two stars were adapted from a photometric to perform with good precision photometry of the comet(see Table 4)

 

Star/Catalog

mag. - USNO B1

mag. - TYCHO 2

mag. - SDSS

T 2574:136:1 (Ref1)

R1=8.95 – R2=8.89

Bt=10.946 – Vt=10,629

R=9.340

T 2574:578:1 (Ref2)

R1=9.77 – R2=9.69

Bt=12.147 – Vt=10,629

R=10.119

 

 

 

 

Tab. 4: photometric parameters of the stars of reference derived from catalogs

on-line using the Aladin, after calibrated astrometry  the image aligned on the stars of the previous figure.

 

The photometric results obtained can be seen in the figures below.

 

 

Km/UA

 

In Meter

Rho (Coma Radius)

2500

 

2500000

D (Earth-Comet)

0,1470

 

22050000000

R (Sun-Comet)

1,1040

 

 

Aperture  9 pixels, Resolution 2.57 arcsec/pixel

 25 cm Telescope Newton f/4.8 + CCD Starlight Express SXL8 + Rc

 

 

Fig. 4: The graphs show the flux of the comet 73/P component b compared with the flux

of the stars of reference (see Table 4 for the characteristics of the stars).

The rms respectively 0.027 for comet and 0.026 for the two stars of reference.

You can notice a decrease in the flux of the comet after JD = 0.33.

 

Fig. 5: The graph of the magnitude of the comet 73/P with the flux converted into magnitudes,

showing an “increase” after JD = 0.33, about 0.1 magnitudes with an rms of 0.026.

 

Table 5 contains all of the counts of comet and star of reference for the complete set of images.

 

 

Tab. 5: stream of comet 73/P and stars measured in reference ADU.

2453854.2948300

43122

77148

42716

7462

2453854.2952639

43263

77186

42118

7466

2453854.2956910

41906

77440

42334

8245

2453854.2961181

43726

77987

44574

7256

2453854.2965451

43511

77571

42832

7124

2453854.2969722

42395

80968

42784

7360

2453854.2974051

46635

81939

44015

6851

2453854.2978368

44829

79937

42819

7766

2453854.2982697

42082

79934

44021

6835

2453854.2987014

42543

79241

42499

6581

2453854.2991285

39404

75079

40089

6559

2453854.2995556

41024

70964

39651

6960

2453854.2999826

42848

77175

42878

6795

2453854.3004178

44315

80350

44099

7523

2453854.3008507

41299

75986

40397

5986

2453854.3012836

41706

73070

39240

7017

2453854.3017153

37008

71079

36351

5587

2453854.3021516

32503

62588

33743

5797

2453854.3025845

32622

61504

33217

4651

2453854.3030116

29289

55679

29462

3622

2453854.3034387

34160

61201

34083

5869

2453854.3038646

32757

62828

32372

5725

2453854.3047188

38450

69845

38685

6905

2453854.3051458

38795

73453

40774

6460

2453854.3055729

41520

74084

39418

6367

2453854.3060012

42677

76695

42539

6723

2453854.3064294

44801

79864

44848

7553

2453854.3068565

44750

81793

43188

7384

2453854.3072824

46080

83451

45802

8598

2453854.3112338

42389

77093

41590

7351

2453854.3116586

44796

82719

44337

7018

2453854.3120868

43952

79834

44569

6690

2453854.3125127

39393

75638

40026

6990

2453854.3129387

39414

71519

38906

7971

2453854.3133692

37629

72553

40967

5745

2453854.3137951

48091

87991

47044

7859

2453854.3142211

38100

70384

38582

7344

2453854.3146539

34730

64462

34974

5771

2453854.3150810

32800

60279

32529

5181

2453854.3155093

28434

56282

28488

4946

2453854.3159363

20492

38034

21139

3135

2453854.3163634

38112

68684

38106

6860

2453854.3167894

41049

73896

40353

5826

2453854.3172164

41467

76812

43358

6273

2453854.3176447

48147

89003

47486

7535

2453854.3180718

48149

85850

44553

8509

2453854.3232025

42562

75731

42256

7224

2453854.3236319

45075

81118

43025

7709

2453854.3260428

49174

88664

47766

8202

2453854.3264699

50100

90785

49995

9423

2453854.3268981

52865

92734

50150

8794

2453854.3273229

49881

90974

48768

8567

2453854.3277500

48863

92440

48795

9181

2453854.3281748

47856

85336

45869

7236

2453854.3286019

45779

85540

48769

6927

2453854.3290289

48186

89477

48941

8705

2453854.3294560

48403

87292

47545

8631

2453854.3298831

47652

89083

49035

8768

2453854.3303102

48495

89567

47982

6933

2453854.3307373

47780

88657

48642

7512

2453854.3311632

49677

94014

49555

8356

2453854.3315891

48846

91980

50490

7354

2453854.3320174

48170

91270

49957

8058

2453854.3324444

48760

93201

50053

7784

2453854.3328727

49710

93820

51172

8330

2453854.3333009

49407

93070

48513

7796

2453854.3337269

36239

67466

34721

6233

2453854.3341516

47106

85642

46316

8508

2453854.3345764

50107

94855

49986

7660

2453854.3350023

47526

90568

46456

7834

2453854.3354271

43731

80639

44166

6850

2453854.3358542

45258

87600

47171

7502

2453854.3362813

45449

81987

45485

8433

2453854.3367083

48856

90578

49431

7848

2453854.3371331

48748

88361

49286

8700

2453854.3375602

47910

85082

48206

8212

2453854.3384132

51688

95900

52899

9387

2453854.3414873

51208

99782

52024

8618

2453854.3419167

52320

101028

54772

8960

2453854.3423437

52349

100523

54490

9896

2453854.3427708

53073

100132

53709

9007

2453854.3431991

53526

98937

53319

7907

2453854.3436273

53347

98506

54782

8884

2453854.3440556

53216

99591

53443

9803

2453854.3449109

52374

100087

53787

9624

2453854.3453368

52767

99574

54305

8875

2453854.3457616

51486

99416

53650

8925

2453854.3461898

54220

97200

53627

10159

2453854.3466169

53521

98869

53360

9400

2453854.3470440

50826

98262

53814

7222

2453854.3474711

52060

98320

50659

10029

2453854.3478981

51398

100018

52322

9785

2453854.3483229

51111

98508

54326

8762

2453854.3487488

53656

98440

51956

9259

2453854.3491759

52244

98781

53077

8182

2453854.3496030

51213

101466

53432

8231

2453854.3500301

50098

89265

51892

8906

2453854.3508843

51537

97129

55581

8439

2453854.3513113

50280

95883

53773

9410

2453854.3517373

53831

101658

54352

8641

2453854.3521678

53745

100975

52800

8076

2453854.3525984

50911

100137

52666

9049

2453854.3530255

51764

98159

53469

7809

2453854.3534525

52435

101186

53714

8057

2453854.3538785

52690

99882

52924

9468

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Using formulas, magstar = - 2.5 * LOG ((1 + (aduref2 + aduref3) / aduref1)) + magref1, where magref1 R is the magnitude of the star brighter used as a reference, obtained from USNOB1 catalog, (see Table 4), you get the magnitude of the star theoretical reference.

Through the formula magcomet = - 2.5 * LOG (aducomet/(aduref1 + aduref2 + aduref3)) + magstar you have the magnitude of the comet. The median values derived with the flux of Table 5 are: magstar = 8.378 (+/-0.012), magcomet=9.581(+/-0.029).

 

 

 

Photometry of the Comet C/2008 J1 (Boattini)
Here are the the orbital elements of the comet C/2008 J1

 
C/2008 J1 (Boattini)
Epoch 2008 Nov. 30.0 TT = JDT 2454800.5
T 2008 July 13.2757 TT                                  MPC
q   1.724289             (2000.0)            P               Q
z  +0.006102       Peri.   68.1304      +0.4602796      +0.1204894
+/- 0.000017       Node   273.4188      -0.6424076      +0.7290203
e   0.989478       Incl.   61.7787      +0.6127440      +0.6738039

 

Comet C/2008 J1 discovery a few months ago from the Italian astronomer A. Boattini, had a seemingly stable photometric performance but showed a very peculiar shape-behaviour. (See fig. 6)

 

Fig. 6: Comet C/2008 J1 taken on 4 September 2008

with a Newton Telescope 250 mm, focal length 1200 mm CCD camera and filter Rc.

 

 

As you can see the coma is very asymmetrical with a part that stretches to the north-east and the other almost in opposition in south-west. This form has remained stable throughout the period of our observations. The series of images for our research were obtained on the evening on 4 September  2008, when the comet was in position circumpolar. There were obtained 120 images from 30 seconds each with a telescope Newton 250 mm aperture, focal length 1200 mm, Atik CCD filter and 16IC Rc direct fire. (for the complete system see Tables 1 and 2).  The pursuit of hype was not optimal for different images are moved, but were the same used for granting the photometry. The stars photometric shown good are 4 and listed in Table 6.

 

 

Fig. 7: Comet C/2008 J1 observed the evening on 4 September  2008.

On the left image was obtained with mediating Astroart

120 frames for 30 sec each, and aligning on the photometric center of the comet.

On the right the same images have been mediated by aligning on the center

of photometric stars. The error of alignment is 2-3 pixels

with the stars moved because of bad pursuit.

 

Stella/Catalogo

mag. - USNO B1

mag. - TYCHO 2

mag. – GSC 2.2

T 4637:1159:1 (Ref1)

R1=11.27– R2=11.23

Bt=12.349 – Vt=11.682

 

T 4637:617:1(Ref2)

R1=11.13 – R2=11.06

Bt=13.956 – Vt=12.105

 

GSC1393 (Ref3)

R1=11.32 - R2=11.15

 

R=11.63

GSC1353 (Ref4)

R1=11.32 - R2=11.38

 

R=11.88

 

 

 

 

Tab. 6: photometric parameters of the stars of reference derived

from catalogs on-line using Aladin, after calibrated

astrometry the image aligned on the stars of the previous figure.

 

 

The photometric results obtained can be seen in the figures below.

 

 

 Comet aperture 9 pixels - Resolution 1.26 arcsec / pixels - 25 cm Ttelescope Newton f / 4.8 + CCD Atik 16IC + Rc

 

Km/UA

 

In Meter

Rho (Coma Radius)

8086

 

8086000

D (Earth-Comet)

1,7480

 

2,622E+11

R (Sun-Comet)

1,8590

 

 

 

 

Fig. 8: The graphs show the flux of Comet C/2008 J1 compared with the flux of the stars of reference

(see table 6 to the characteristics of the stars). The rms respectively 0.033 for the comet and 0.015,

0.016, 0.014 and 0.019 for the four stars of reference. In this case you can see a steady flux to the comet

 

 

 

Fig. 9: The graph of the magnitude of Comet C/2008 J1 with the flux converted into magnitudes.

 

Table 7 contains all of the counts of comet and star of reference for the complete set of images.

 

Tab. 7: flux of Comet C/2008 j1 and reference stars measured in ADU.

JD

FLUX J1

REF1

REF2

REF3

REF4

2454714.3031400

18874

245875

222713

212977

173819

2454714.3038912

18420

253472

218828

212601

176458

2454714.3046435

18142

245895

224638

208284

173900

2454714.3053958

18133

242647

223286

213281

179610

2454714.3099109

17733

244434

216729

203897

178731

2454714.3106632

17668

240236

219056

204217

177629

2454714.3114155

18245

240671

216362

204213

169502

2454714.3121678

18669

244127

221165

207542

173659

2454714.3144248

18442

235001

218930

209665

170851

2454714.3174317

18405

245570

214685

203178

168355

2454714.3181840

17489

242733

218669

206881

169021

2454714.3189363

17133

238523

213165

210145

171222

2454714.3196887

18018

239488

208716

204651

173325

2454714.3204410

17084

241981

212967

208017

170167

2454714.3211933

18301

240135

217480

201351

171155

2454714.3219456

17821

242549

219252

206058

179801

2454714.3226979

18059

237805

216615

203213

171788

2454714.3234502

17410

244399

213869

201020

173868

2454714.3242025

17933

239360

218067

207680

172780

2454714.3249537

18619

242001

220301

206994

174190

2454714.3272060

17375

241884

223142

208855

171438

2454714.3302141

18157

241299

215738

209070

169150

2454714.3317164

18689

242728

217818

205311

173234

2454714.3324688

18278

244125

219442

206704

168348

2454714.3332199

17000

238077

217973

209619

167213

2454714.3339722

18904

242767

217060

206526

176056

2454714.3347222

17479

234015

215369

205403

174140

2454714.3354745

17880

236483

219168

203051

169807

2454714.3362269

17294

233079

213202

208774

168975

2454714.3369792

16814

238769

214999

201713

171643

2454714.3377303

17553

233497

212183

203835

168614

2454714.3392338

17482

238611

217952

199011

164718

2454714.3399861

17598

234458

213103

201071

167594

2454714.3407373

16847

232583

214739

206655

171227

2454714.3422407

16874

234063

211729

203823

168908

2454714.3429919

18457

237978

208213

200498

170823

2454714.3437442

18464

236291

214609

203953

168025

2454714.3452477

17493

235147

218660

206231

166720

2454714.3460000

18119

239310

215962

202415

164812

2454714.3467546

17875

232375

219524

202079

167912

2454714.3475069

18659

239577

213984

206503

167367

2454714.3482593

17267

233063

219596

208560

175925

2454714.3497627

17171

236689

213270

200364

172910

2454714.3505139

17285

237687

214304

197557

167595

2454714.3512662

16870

231404

213348

198920

167256

2454714.3520440

16721

229285

210145

201836

166196

2454714.3535463

16252

230441

208440

201572

164855

2454714.3542986

16436

232161

215050

201111

165823

2454714.3550509

17394

230301

212043

199631

172361

2454714.3558032

18354

236899

212054

201038

167810

2454714.3565544

16942

237107

219957

203007

171447

2454714.3573067

17700

234630

218623

204776

171500

2454714.3588102

17339

242049

211012

209180

173012

2454714.3603137

18890

237448

215079

209571

174886

2454714.3610648

18269

238738

219464

204326

169609

2454714.3618171

17571

239704

215044

209232

173936

2454714.3625694

17439

237467

214809

203765

164596

2454714.3633206

17779

239445

214869

207153

169952

2454714.3640718

17362

243125

218798

207177

161879

2454714.3648241

17622

241400

215737

211213

172211

2454714.3670787

16919

239450

218923

208054

172940

2454714.3678287

18955

239932

221623

212892

171010

2454714.3685810

18255

244619

217409

205596

175083

2454714.3693333

18072

240864

220085

204083

168337

2454714.3700845

18257

241872

226881

210498

170606

2454714.3708356

18525

238506

221179

207278

172561

2454714.3715880

18640

246568

221219

211742

170405

2454714.3723391

18594

243821

215176

204609

168390

2454714.3730914

18377

239463

223369

212002

167849

2454714.3745949

18127

236085

217971

205026

174093

2454714.3753484

19155

236740

219834

206834

173195

2454714.3760995

18429

233979

212231

208493

174678

2454714.3776030

17626

243636

217492

206478

170289

2454714.3783542

16972

241982

216403

207006

172598

2454714.3791053

17726

243870

214632

206912

170358

2454714.3798576

18090

241292

219561

204245

167541

2454714.3806088

17750

236792

217340

203519

169424

2454714.3813611

18682

236327

219197

203524

168310

2454714.3828646

17944

239353

212514

201802

173039

2454714.3843692

16800

235332

213562

203659

167766

2454714.3851215

18727

237857

215517

199941

170392

2454714.3858727

18076

228357

209310

201855

169326

2454714.3866250

17576

234272

216829

203240

166036

2454714.3873762

16704

235636

218036

203021

172795

2454714.3888796

17942

235660

218047

198438

166511

2454714.3903831

17678

235787

212758

201402

165550

2454714.3918866

17043

236001

216339

201378

168996

2454714.3926377

16564

238188

211582

203442

168518

 

Using the formula, magstar=-2.5*LOG((1+(aduref2+aduref3+aduref4)/aduref1))+magref1, where magref1 R is the magnitude of the star brighter used as a reference, obtained from USNO catalog B1, (see Table 6), you get the magnitude of the star magstar theoretical reference. Through the formula, magcomet=-2.5*LOG(aducometa/(aduref1+aduref2+aduref3+aduref4))+magstella. The median values derived with the flux of Table 7 are The following:  magstar=9.895(+/-0.012), magcomet=14.068 (+/-0.036)

 

 

Photometry of the Comet 6P/d’Arrest

Here are the the orbital elements of the comet 6P

 

6P/d'Arrest
Epoch 2008 Aug. 2.0 TT = JDT 2454680.5
T 2008 Aug. 14.9589 TT                                  MPC
q   1.353507             (2000.0)            P               Q
n   0.1507993      Peri.  178.1196      +0.7332504      +0.6435761
a   3.495718       Node   138.9358      -0.6281291      +0.7646977
e   0.612810       Incl.   19.5148      -0.2603801      -0.0323621
P   6.54

 

The periodic 6P, with a period of 6.54 years, has repeatedly made the halfway point and has been studied in depth. The last step to the minimum distance from the sun happened on 2 August 2008 and was seen  almost daily for a discrete period of time. It was then pointed out the possible outburst of small claims that first had not been observed. (See link ... ... ...)

 

Fig. 10: Comet 6P observed on 25 August 2008

with a Newton Telescope 250 mm,
1200 mm focal length CCD camera and filter Rc

 

The increase in brightness was quite sudden, but apparently in agreement with his approach to our star, in August, reaching an apparent visual magnitude around 9. The survey CCD instead showed that there were signs of outburst that were not observed visually.
The series of images for our research were obtained on the evening of 25 August 2008, when the comet was 18 degrees over the location for our, DECL. = -26 45 10 south in the constellation of Capricorn. There were obtained 120 images from 30 seconds each with a telescope Newton 250 mm aperture, focal length 1200 mm, Atik CCD filter and 16IC Rc direct focus. (for the complete system see Tables 1 and 2).
The pursuit of hype was not optimal for different images are moved, but were the same used for granting the photometry. The inner part of the hair including false nucleus has been defocused to a FWHM of 14 pixels. (See fig. 11)

 

Fig. 11: Window aperture of 14 pixels for the inner side of the coma of the comet.

 

Even the stars in the field are therefore defocused. Those found to have good photometric are 5 and the listed in Table 8.

 

Fig. 12: Comet 6P observed the evening of 25 August 2008.

On the left image was obtained with mediating Astroart 120 frames for 30 sec each, and aligning on the photometric center of the comet.

On the right the same images have been mediated by aligning on the center of photometric stars. The error of alignment is 1-2 pixels.

 

Stella/Catalogo

mag. - USNO B1

mag. - TYCHO 2

mag. – GSC 2.2

T 6916:1257:1(Ref1)

R1=10.53– R2=10.50

Bt=11.223 – Vt=10.788

 

GSC 6916:1515 (Ref2)

R1=12.77 – R2=12.28

 

R=11.89

GSC 6916:1396 (Ref3)

R1=12.88 - R2=12.61

 

R=12.19

GSC 6916:1522 (Ref4)

R1=13.33 - R2=13.04

 

R=12.69

GSC  6916:1391 (Ref5)

R1=13.46 – R2=12.93

 

R=14.41

Tab. 8: photometric parameters of the stars of reference derived from catalogs on-line using the Aladin,

after calibrated astrometry the image aligned on the stars of the previous figure.

 

Photometric results obtained can be seen in the figures below.

 

Aperture 18 pixels - Resolution 1.26 arcsec / pixels - 25 cm telescope Newton f / 4.8 + CCD Atik 16IC + Rc

 

Km/UA

 

In Meter

 

 

Rho(Coma radius)

3556

 

3556000

 

 

D(Earth-Comet)

0,384000

 

57600000000

 

 

R(Sun-Comet)

1,359300

 

2,03895E+11

 

 

 

 

Fig. 13: The graphs show the flow of comet 6P compared with the flow of the stars of reference

(see Table 8 for the characteristics of the stars).

The rms respectively 0.070 for the comet and 0.066, 0.117, 0.085, 0.100 and 0.156 for the five stars of reference.

 

Fig. 14: The graph of the magnitude of the comet 6P with the flux converted into magnitudes.

 

Table 9 contains all of the counts of comet and star of reference for the complete set of images.

 

Tab. 9: flux of comet 6P and reference stars measured in ADU.

JD

FLUX6P

REF1

REF2

REF3

REF4

REF5

2454704.3083700

37867

224178

47183

38927

20148

14576

2454704.3109861

42824

223268

45818

31885

23986

17024

2454704.3113912

39180

224716

46784

37926

21857

20870

2454704.3117951

39002

227117

48248

35008

20863

21727

2454704.3122002

40843

226255

48009

40420

27079

26528

2454704.3126042

45915

231501

49080

33373

25076

20758

2454704.3130104

40377

230241

47846

36436

28258

23665

2454704.3134155

41071

229023

48297

40692

20405

20019

2454704.3138194

46246

233043

46849

31612

20765

20386

2454704.3142257

43130

229366

52568

35948

25029

21327

2454704.3146308

38978

229414

53867

41207

22496

16884

2454704.3150359

39156

230281

51956

39110

24439

19139

2454704.3154410

42554

232979

46456

39065

23859

24958

2454704.3158472

41442

229932

43404

35045

24199

20071

2454704.3162836

37332

233405

52041

34386

26034

17982

2454704.3166875

46279

228677

54908

37957

18589

23658

2454704.3170914

42250

228710

52010

36268

21542

15776

2454704.3174965

41567

231089

49512

35910

22145

17856

2454704.3179005

39710

212056

42193

31064

23542

17604

2454704.3187095

39995

228884

49485

40509

23891

20922

2454704.3191134

45640

231753

51540

32687

30443

18268

2454704.3195185

41316

222134

47725

32381

24972

21428

2454704.3199236

36875

228439

56454

36080

19940

22840

2454704.3203287

40365

230221

45685

32720

23733

23736

2454704.3207338

43772

231807

47436

37165

22160

25331

2454704.3211389

43600

228490

50170

36296

20841

20299

2454704.3219491

38244

228196

50395

41505

24331

22020

2454704.3223553

46129

229800

51281

36517

24871

16364

2454704.3227604

40185

243119

51397

36123

27038

24729

2454704.3231644

43824

237051

55095

46937

29188

21709

2454704.3235694

45036

233168

48929

35965

22597

19059

2454704.3243773

41870

232529

50224

40205

26059

19267

2454704.3247789

44571

237753

50540

39775

24050

17214

2454704.3251840

42006

234547

49770

39477

24108

16752

2454704.3255880

48215

246234

53023

41294

25611

26804

2454704.3259931

40094

237541

56203

34457

24437

19020

2454704.3263970

45747

232447

55212

36998

23827

18972

2454704.3268021

37021

229948

53939

39498

26476

23454

2454704.3276111

44084

237780

54585

36361

22018

17655

2454704.3280162

47151

236811

52473

40086

28361

26275

2454704.3284201

39204

237875

54199

40514

28482

23081

2454704.3292303

39980

236834

52838

42414

29297

22900

2454704.3296354

43274

234596

53848

39957

23576

20152

2454704.3300405

37443

243613

52748

41703

26235

21922

2454704.3304456

44254

244385

50139

40886

23394

24578

2454704.3308495

42377

243936

51130

39786

20902

16257

2454704.3312546

46943

231648

55593

35349

23199

22439

2454704.3320648

42695

242374

50438

40231

22914

22850

2454704.3324699

42816

245335

51396

37125

31012

23130

2454704.3332801

42389

237410

55330

42015

24349

18268

2454704.3336863

46439

237130

53607

34724

26854

24042

2454704.3340914

44372

246804

55613

30492

28332

20285

2454704.3344977

43895

244160

50004

34655

26424

22092

2454704.3349016

44738

237793

56328

43824

25043

21970

2454704.3353067

43563

241437

51260

39982

25582

24261

2454704.3357106

49113

241942

51663

37861

24389

23251

2454704.3361157

43782

243737

47455

40399

21849

22947

2454704.3365197

46067

237199

51358

41909

28308

20642

2454704.3369236

44631

240665

49711

38341

27084

20433

2454704.3381366

45260

241711

55006

40648

22410

16245

2454704.3397558

43172

245454

49875

42573

29218

18015

2454704.3401609

40415

237169

49326

42724

24539

19745

2454704.3405660

44761

238140

49681

38713

26481

22555

2454704.3409711

41853

236062

51351

39448

24890

16242

2454704.3413762

44323

243477

51445

38304

25997

17168

2454704.3417801

45337

238029

49023

39085

26613

17749

2454704.3421852

43278

233822

55607

38472

25389

18162

2454704.3429954

39533

241041

49570

38782

22750

17855

2454704.3438067

47807

245839

47268

37791

26391

20100

2454704.3454271

43857

242345

52525

39372

24995

15223

2454704.3458310

49617

254965

51602

38497

24204

21322

2454704.3462361

46831

287115

51169

42109

26491

21288

2454704.3466400

40746

256219

51052

31434

26603

22317

2454704.3470451

46335

252329

50579

37702

26808

16425

2454704.3474537

47700

237153

49662

39809

27608

18685

2454704.3482616

43618

240948

44360

39867

24539

13244

2454704.3490683

46483

239310

47070

40047

25990

15664

2454704.3498715

39114

239155

50893

43584

24719

18817

2454704.3506782

43561

239541

50671

41086

25429

20481

2454704.3510833

43571

243364

45814

41517

28270

19256

2454704.3514873

44280

243450

52107

39636

27828

15329

2454704.3518924

44370

239198

53437

36852

29624

21106

2454704.3522975

41430

311198

51473

44277

28552

17169

2454704.3527025

42537

284545

50191

35616

27059

19081

2454704.3531065

45634

268876

52894

36145

26812

15087

2454704.3535116

41079

233942

48088

38004

28196

17865

2454704.3539167

41866

241125

47377

38085

27682

19558

2454704.3543218

43037

242980

45975

36784

28496

18200

2454704.3555359

41752

245819

44444

35270

26091

19685

2454704.3563449

40016

240343

46839

42883

24396

20637

 

Using the formula, magstar =-2.5 * LOG ((1+(aduref2+aduref3+aduref4+aduref5)/aduref1))+magref1, where magref1  R is the magnitude of the star brighter used as a reference, obtained from USNO catalog USNO B1, (see Table 8), you get the magnitude of the star magstar theoretical reference. Through the formula, magcomet=-2.5*LOG(aducometa /( aduref1+aduref2+aduref3+aduref4+aduref5))+ magstar The median values derived with the flux of table 9 are as follows:  magstar = 10,029 (+ / -0.024), magcometa = 12,370 (+ / -0.077)