Community
 
Aggiungi lista preferiti Aggiungi lista nera Invia ad un amico
------------------
Crea
Profilo
Blog
Video
Sito
Foto
Amici
   
 
 

ANALOG SOUND VS. DIGITAL SOUND

About of ANALOG SOUND VS. DIGITAL SOUND









Analog vs. Digital - Outer Sound

  • . Factors that might influence your decision include cost, sound quality, cost of tape, reliability, compatibility with other studios, ease of expansion, how the medium might alter the original sound, and what special stuff it can do.
  • . analog is generally more fun overall but lower sound quality.
  • . digital can be prone to fussiness, but is generally a cleaner sound.
  • . digital is a more faithful reproduction of the original sound - it's near CD quality.
  • . Analog tends to modify the original sound but in a pleasant way - mostly for guitars and bass.
  • . digital barely alters the original sound at all no matter how many times you bounce tracks - the sound really doesn't degrade.
  • . analog alters the sound - sometimes in a pleasant way - and does degrade over the course of many bounces.



    Digital vs Analog
  • . The problem is that the human ear can distinguish the content differences between the original sound and the synthesized sound of typical digital playbacks.
  • . "Man, these sound so much better!" I explained to him why he was wrong, of course.
  • . It did sound better.
  • . But it just sounded "better".
  • . The sound is definitely fuller in most cases, enough so that I rarely whine about having only 1 tone control per channel.
  • . It's a more honest sound, too, forcing me to play better.



    ANALOG vs. DIGITAL: no clear victor - Technology Information Emedia Professional - FindArticles
  • . I liked it because it catered to vinyl enthusiasts, those who believe that records deliver better sound than compact discs.
  • . The magazine's anti-CD editorial stance manifested itself most entertainingly in its record reviews, in which statements such as "The sound on the original LP ...
  • . I'd have to say I subscribe to the pro-analog view, with the qualification that superior high-end phonographic and stereo equipment is required to realize the difference--precisely the reason most people, who have never experienced the awesome sound of analog audio on really good equipment, believe the vinyl enthusiasts are crazy.
  • . Advertisement Why? The promises of hiss-free recording, practically unlimited "virtual" tracks (as opposed to the four on my aging and rather hiss-prone cassette deck), the precision of digital editing, and a dramatic sound-quality boost are compelling enough reasons for me.
  • . My one caveat is the highly subjective perception of the shortcomings of digital sound as illustrated in the LP versus CD debate.



    Digital Music online course - Digital represantion of sound
  • | What is a sound? What is a sound from a physical point of view? It is the result of a mechanical disturbance of some object in a physical medium, such as air.
  • . Digital Signal An analog sound signal is the result of measuring the voltage that represents the sound.
  • . A digital sound is the result of counting all these values many times per second for a certain defined length/time.
  • . In order to process sounds on the computer, the analog sound must be converted into a digital format understandable by computer; that is, binary numbers.
  • . Analog sound into digital sound Computers are normally configured to function based upon strings of bits (binary numbers) of fixed size, called words.
  • . The above figure shows the process of converting a sound (e.g., coming from an instrument such as the violin) into a digital representation: a microphone or a line-level source converts sound into voltage; an analog-to-digital converter then converts voltage into binary numbers; then a computer stores the resulting sound.

  • info: ANALOG SOUND VS. DIGITAL SOUND


    Photo by www.1848uenn.de


    Howstuffworks "How Sound Cards Work"
  • Popular Searches > > > > > > > Sponsored By: Subjects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How Sound Cards Work by Table of Contents Analog vs.
  • . Digital Sounds and computer data are fundamentally different.
  • . Sounds are analog - they are made of waves that travel through matter.
  • . People hear sounds when these waves physically vibrate their .
  • . Like a, a sound card translates between a computer's digital information and the outside world's analog information.
  • . Sound is made of waves that travel through a medium, such as air or water.
  • . The most basic sound card is a printed circuit board that uses four components to translate information: An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) A digital-to-analog converter (DAC) An ISA or PCI interface to connect the card to the Input and output connections for a microphone and Instead of separate ADCs and DACs, some sound cards use a coder/decoder chip, also called a CODEC , which performs both functions.
  • . A sound card must translate between sound waves and .


    Digital TV: A Cringley Crash Course -- Digital Vs. Analog
  • / / Digital Sound The days of vinyl are long gone.
  • . Stereophonic sound! When CD's appeared on the market, most people were skeptical about the silver discs, but the sound was great.
  • . Taking the next logical step, HDTV will broadcast sound using the Dolby Digital/AC-3 audio encoding system.
  • . It's the same digital sound used in most movie theaters, DVDs, and many home theater systems since the early 1990's.
  • . It can include up to 5.1 channels of sound: three in front (left, center, and right), two in back (left and right), and a subwoofer bass for a sound you can feel (that's the .1 channel).
  • . Sound on digital TV will be "CD quality" with a range of frequencies lower and higher than most of us can even hear.


    Upsampling vs Oversampling for Digital Audio
  • . So does upsampling to higher rates really provide better sound? The following will briefly try to go into the details behind why upsampling is used and if it really is the answer to better sound.


    Upsampling vs. Oversampling for Digital Audio
  • . So does upsampling to higher rates really provide better sound? The following will briefly try to go into the details behind why upsampling is used and if it really is the answer to better sound.

  • Benefits


    Photo by www.anotherlevelrecords.com


    Indie-Music.com - Analog Vs. Digital Mastering
  • . Analog -- It's All About Resolution Analog has -- and always will have -- better resolution than digital, but it comes with the side-effect of sound coloration.
  • . Even if a piece of equipment is on bypass, the act of routing a signal through it affects the sound.
  • . Many people want what they call a "fat, warm sound." This is certainly an attribute that analog equipment can impart, but there are two other factors even more important in achieving this sound: the skill of the mastering engineer and how the music was recorded, as he/she can only work with what an artist delivers.
  • . If the original recording sounds like The Back Street Boys, analog mastering cannot give it the sonic characteristics of early Steely Dan.
  • . Likewise, if a mastering engineer over-processes, even the best analog gear can sound harsh or muddy.
  • . Simply having a piece of analog gear in a signal chain is no guarantee of "analog" sound.
  • . In mastering, the ultimate goal is to apply changes to music that maximize its sound -- punchier drums, clearer bass, or whatever is desired -- without imparting any coloration from the process itself, while at the same time maintaining the highest resolution.


    Technical Reference Infobase: Analog vs. Digital
  • . Sound is analog, as it is always changing.
  • . Thus, in order to send information over a phone line, a modem must take the digital data given it by the computer and convert it into sound, an analog signal.


    Digital Domain
  • Fort Hill Back to Analog (updated 2005) Back to Analog The Pros and Cons of Recording and Mixing via Analog versus Digital This article has been revised and updated from an editorial counterpoint which appeared in Pro Sound News , January 1997.
  • . Analog requires constant vigilance to sound good.
  • . Only the best-designed tube equipment has quiet, clear sound, tight (defined bass), is transparent and dimensional, yet still warm without being artificial or muddy.
  • . Similarly, some of the cheap digital audio equipment is edgy or hard-sounding, dimensionless, and unclear.
  • . Only the very best digital audio equipment (and it's getting better every day) can lay claim to good soundstage width and depth, purity of tone without an artificial edge, and transparency.
  • . Bad digital sounds bad because it is bad.
  • . Edgy sound can be caused by many factors: sharp filters, poor conversion technology, low resolution (short wordlength), poor analog stages, jitter, improper dither, clock leakage in analog stages due to bad circuit board design and many others.


    Casual vinyl vs digital blind test - Hydrogenaudio Forums
  • . The ampli vinyl input (pure analog) was compared to the DAT input (digitized to 48 kHz 16 bits).Preliminaries listening sessions : the digital sound seems more bright, shiny and detailed to me, the vinyl more smooth, silky and "noisy".
  • . The digital sound seems also "tiresome".
  • . Anyway, noting 0 for false and 1 for true, she got0 0 0 1 1 -pause- 1 1 1, so it's a failure whatever way we interpret the results.Here's a sample of what we listened to, to illustrate the ability of digital to reproduce the "warm, fuzzy, fat, analog sound of vinyl".
  • . Apr 17 2003, 04:56 Post Group: Members Posts: 514 Joined: 9-October 01 Member No.: 254 [IMHO]Comparing vinyl to digital sound is a very subjective process: it seems that we love the distorted sound from the vinyl (sounds more life-like to some people), also the mastering & the ADC process (CD) has a ton to say here.
  • . blah)Anyway, if you have a good stereo system (preferably flat (+-2dB) from 30 to 20kHz) you might enjoy more the vynil (more airy and life-like sounding), but I don't think it has anything to do with the capabilities of the formats.Oh, for people thinking vynil sound beats digital: try Spyro Gyra - Got The Magic in the CD release.

  • ANALOG SOUND VS. DIGITAL SOUND ?



    The Analog vs Digital Debate@Everything2.com

  • . And second, these sound better.
  • . While the is not the, or even the that started the, it may very well be the that led to the of the debate between those who favor preservation of sound and those who embrace recordings.
  • . Although sound advancements came before video.
  • . Though hard for some enthusiasts to believe, a defiant minority of still that digital is not an improvement on sound quality.
  • . Proponents of analog insist that loses the nuances of recordings, leaving the sound harsh and cold.
  • . Proponents of digital recordings to analogous because digital recording devices leave no hiss or popping sounds to the, and they do a better job of reproducing dynamic variety, higher frequencies, and sudden subtle changes in original recordings.
  • . Moreover, being less fragile, digital recordings can theoretically be copied indefinitely onto other digital media without sound degradation or quality loss.


    Digital Dharma of Audio A/D Converters
  • . Aside from the gross example of having the digital processing actually fail and cause a word to be lost or corrupted into none use, nothing can change the sound of the word.
  • . Just what is dither ? Aside from being a funny sounding word, it is a wonderfully accurate choice for what is being done.
  • . An examination of the spectral analysis of this waveform reveals lots of nasty sounding distortion products.


    M Works - Analog vs. Digital
  • . The analogues are hissing and murmuring about warmth, imaging, depth of field, and natural sounds, while the digit-heads are buzzing about cleanliness, faithful reproduction, ease of use, and blah blah blah...
  • . It amazes me that people who represent themselves as audio professionals and audiophiles can make a blanket statement such as, "I always records analog because digital sounds cold", or "I always mix to digital so I get a flat frequency response." It seems criminal to me that the words digital and analog can be used to market a device without any regard for its appropriateness to certain applications or its design.
  • .   Myth #1: "If it's digital it sounds better" (or quieter).
  • . Some A to D converters sound great.
  • . It will sound so much better and I'll be able to work faster." The one absolute truth is that it will cost you money.
  • . And digital recording can 'sound different'.
  • . It may reveal things about your studio which were best left masked by analog noise!   Myth #3: "I'm going to mix to analog because digital sounds too bright and harsh to me." Many people have had bad experiences with poorly designed equipment.


    SACD vs. DVD-Audio: High Definition Formats Evaluation
  • . But if a 16bit 44100  kHz PCM source was used as a master track, the sound quality of the resulting SACD disc could be worse than that of the similar CD record.
  • . In case of correct CD playback (as it is implemented in devices from some High-End manufacturers) and incorrect playback of SACD and/or DVD-A, the former may have higher quality sound, defined in double blind tests (ABX eliminates the placebo effect, or the autosuggestion influence of the listener on the final results), which in its turn served as a battleground for disputes about the quality of high definition formats.
  • . Difficulties in Processing You should take into account that the DSD format is significantly more difficult to process regarding bass management and time alignment control for sound equalization at the listener's point as well as for acoustic system calibration (acoustics-room).
  • . Scientific Analysis of formats And what does the science say about the sound difference in DVD-A and SACD in comparison with CD-DA and the reasons for such differences or their lack? Let's take a look at .


    New Car Audio Options Expand: HD Radio, iPod Adapters, DVD-Audio
  • Digital Audio for Cars: A Guide to What's New Friday, June 16, 2006 Digital Audio for Cars: A Guide to What's New Related Articles More Info Tools Photos Honda's Music Link option in the new Fit includes a black connector cable, linking the ubiquitous iPod to the car's sound system.
  • . Calem Date posted: 05-29-2006 From iPods to radios, the trend in audio is toward digital sound reproduction — and automakers are listening.
  • . A growing number of automakers have responded to the overwhelming popularity of the iPod by introducing so-called iPod integration kits or adapters, which connect the ubiquitous device directly to a vehicle's sound system.
  • . Most are simple cables that are hard-wired through the glovebox into the sound system behind the dashboard, but the iPod adapter also can be in the form of a cradle that holds the iPod and uses a built-in FM transmitter to broadcast its contents to the sound system.
  • . With even the least expensive cars sporting a CD player, some luxury automakers are pushing a newer, better-sounding type of digital music disc: the DVD-Audio disc.

    http://digilander.libero.it/a_digital/ @CallCenter